Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Earlier it emerged that three close associates of Epstein have been questioned in the US about whether Prince Andrew was involved in sexual activity with underaged girls.
In separate depositions made to courts, Sarah Kellen, Nada Marcinkova and Adriana Ross all declined to answer.
According to court documents, Kellen was asked in March 2010: “Would you agree with me that Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein used to share underaged girls for sexual relations?”
She replied: “On the instruction of my lawyer, I must invoke my fifth amendment privilege.”
Ross was asked by attorney Brad Edwards that same month: “Has Prince Andrew been involved with underage minor females to your knowledge?”
She said: “I refuse to answer.”
Marcinkova – who was described as another “sex slave” to Epstein by several of his alleged victims – was asked by Edwards in April 2010: “Have you ever been made to perform sexually on Prince Andrew?”
She replied: “Fifth.”
The Buckingham Palace strategy appears to be to await further developments in the US legal action before considering issuing a more detailed response. The judge in the case which Roberts is seeking to join has yet to decide on her application and as yet, Roberts’ deposition does not contain any detail about the dates of Prince Andrew’s alleged sexual contact with her.
In separate depositions made to courts, Sarah Kellen, Nada Marcinkova and Adriana Ross all declined to answer.
According to court documents, Kellen was asked in March 2010: “Would you agree with me that Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein used to share underaged girls for sexual relations?”
She replied: “On the instruction of my lawyer, I must invoke my fifth amendment privilege.”
Ross was asked by attorney Brad Edwards that same month: “Has Prince Andrew been involved with underage minor females to your knowledge?”
She said: “I refuse to answer.”
Marcinkova – who was described as another “sex slave” to Epstein by several of his alleged victims – was asked by Edwards in April 2010: “Have you ever been made to perform sexually on Prince Andrew?”
She replied: “Fifth.”
The Buckingham Palace strategy appears to be to await further developments in the US legal action before considering issuing a more detailed response. The judge in the case which Roberts is seeking to join has yet to decide on her application and as yet, Roberts’ deposition does not contain any detail about the dates of Prince Andrew’s alleged sexual contact with her.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/05/prince-andrew-sex-claims-rehashed-says-epstein-lawyer
As for what happens, I'd go with unfortunate accident.
We do know the British elites seem to be riddled with Pedophiles and perverts. Shades of Alister Crowley. "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read