Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 11:02 AM Jan 2015

FBI says search warrants not needed to use “stingrays” in public places [View all]

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is taking the position that court warrants are not required when deploying cell-site simulators in public places. Nicknamed "stingrays," the devices are decoy cell towers that capture locations and identities of mobile phone users and can intercept calls and texts.

The FBI made its position known during private briefings with staff members of Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa). In response, the two lawmakers wrote Attorney General Eric Holder and Homeland Security chief Jeh Johnson, maintaining they were "concerned about whether the FBI and other law enforcement agencies have adequately considered the privacy interests" of Americans.

According to the letter, which was released last week:

For example, we understand that the FBI’s new policy requires FBI agents to obtain a search warrant whenever a cell-site simulator is used as part of a FBI investigation or operation, unless one of several exceptions apply, including (among others): (1) cases that pose an imminent danger to public safety, (2) cases that involve a fugitive, or (3) cases in which the technology is used in public places or other locations at which the FBI deems there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/01/fbi-says-search-warrants-not-needed-to-use-stringrays-in-public-places/



Use your phone in public your fair game for the american Ministry for State Security

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One more squeeze on privacy in America nt newfie11 Jan 2015 #1
No--it's actually pretty consistent with Smith v. Maryland. You'd still need a warrant msanthrope Jan 2015 #12
D.C. Public Library Will Live-Stream a 10-Hour Reading Of George Orwell's 1984 mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2015 #2
One would think that a simple memo from the Attorney General Lurks Often Jan 2015 #3
An abomination on personal privacy, civil liberties and the rule of law. These things must have Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #4
Didn't the SCOTUS rule in the 90s that cell phones have no expectation of privacy? MohRokTah Jan 2015 #5
Technologically that hasn't been true since the late 90s LeftyMom Jan 2015 #6
Land lines are also in public places. So what stopped them from tapping the lines? L0oniX Jan 2015 #7
IIRC, they could tap payphones w/o a warrant. jeff47 Jan 2015 #8
No---I think it's Katz---a conversation (content) of a payphone would not be recordable without a msanthrope Jan 2015 #11
Aren't the Stingray devices JimDandy Jan 2015 #20
At the rate Law Enforcements are killing black people in this country Hutzpa Jan 2015 #9
good info frylock Jan 2015 #13
Then the pen register argument JimDandy Jan 2015 #21
Well, we all know the Constitution is just a piece of paper after all... truebrit71 Jan 2015 #10
"Death to America" is largely a domestic undertaking, isn't it? k&r n/t bobthedrummer Jan 2015 #14
Riddle me this Batman: How is it even fucking remotely possible SomethingFishy Jan 2015 #15
Please don't be this naive. Hutzpa Jan 2015 #16
Seriously? SomethingFishy Jan 2015 #18
Okay... maybe I misread your post because of this sentence Hutzpa Jan 2015 #19
Range and position. jeff47 Jan 2015 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FBI says search warrants ...