Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "we lost the torture debate completely" [View all]OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)15. Marc Thiessen is an asshole.
Marc Thiessen: Brennan must defend CIAs terrorist interrogation program
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/marc-thiessen-brennan-must-defend-cias-terrorist-interrogation-program/2014/04/07/ba0382d2-ba7f-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html
It is clear that Feinstein and the Democrats on the Intelligence Committee dont understand the value of interrogation, because they failed to question one single CIA official involved with the program as part of their investigation. How you do issue a 6,300-page report on a CIA program without even speaking to the people who actually ran the program? It would be as if the 9/11 Commission (which, by the way, relied on CIA interrogations for one-quarter of all its footnotes) had failed to question one single senior government official in determining what went wrong on Sept. 11, 2001. Why on Earth would Feinstein fail to interview the CIA officials she presumes to sit in judgment of and fail to hear their side of the story unless, of course, she was not interested in their side of the story?
This past week, Obamas former deputy CIA director, Michael Morell, gave an interview to Charlie Rose in which he vigorously defended the effectiveness of the interrogation program. Ive really studied this, and I believe the techniques were effective, Morell declared. Ive looked at the information provided by detainees prior to the techniques and the information provided after the use of the techniques. . . . The information prior to the techniques was limited, vague, not specific. After the techniques? Volumes of information, specific, actionable. There is a big difference.
Morell explained how Khalid Sheik Mohammeds questioning was critical to the successful effort to find Osama bin Laden. When we questioned {KSM} about Abu Ahmed, the courier who eventually took us to bin Laden, he denied knowing Abu Ahmed. When he went back to his cell, we were monitoring him, and we heard him tell other detainees dont say anything about the courier. KSMs efforts to protect the courier are what alerted the agency to his importance and eventually led the agency to bin Ladens lair in Abbottabad.
Former CIA director Mike Hayden has been even more blunt, comparing interrogation deniers like Feinstein to birthers who deny that Obama is an American citizen and to 9/11 truthers who claim that 9/11 was a Bush administration plot.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/marc-thiessen-brennan-must-defend-cias-terrorist-interrogation-program/2014/04/07/ba0382d2-ba7f-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html
It is clear that Feinstein and the Democrats on the Intelligence Committee dont understand the value of interrogation, because they failed to question one single CIA official involved with the program as part of their investigation. How you do issue a 6,300-page report on a CIA program without even speaking to the people who actually ran the program? It would be as if the 9/11 Commission (which, by the way, relied on CIA interrogations for one-quarter of all its footnotes) had failed to question one single senior government official in determining what went wrong on Sept. 11, 2001. Why on Earth would Feinstein fail to interview the CIA officials she presumes to sit in judgment of and fail to hear their side of the story unless, of course, she was not interested in their side of the story?
This past week, Obamas former deputy CIA director, Michael Morell, gave an interview to Charlie Rose in which he vigorously defended the effectiveness of the interrogation program. Ive really studied this, and I believe the techniques were effective, Morell declared. Ive looked at the information provided by detainees prior to the techniques and the information provided after the use of the techniques. . . . The information prior to the techniques was limited, vague, not specific. After the techniques? Volumes of information, specific, actionable. There is a big difference.
Morell explained how Khalid Sheik Mohammeds questioning was critical to the successful effort to find Osama bin Laden. When we questioned {KSM} about Abu Ahmed, the courier who eventually took us to bin Laden, he denied knowing Abu Ahmed. When he went back to his cell, we were monitoring him, and we heard him tell other detainees dont say anything about the courier. KSMs efforts to protect the courier are what alerted the agency to his importance and eventually led the agency to bin Ladens lair in Abbottabad.
Former CIA director Mike Hayden has been even more blunt, comparing interrogation deniers like Feinstein to birthers who deny that Obama is an American citizen and to 9/11 truthers who claim that 9/11 was a Bush administration plot.
Former Bush Speechwriter: CIA Torturers Are American Heroes
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2009/01/26/35286/mark-thiessen-bush/
Today, in an interview on WAMUs Diane Rehm Show, Thiessen again lashed out at Obama, this time for Obamas executive order closing Guantanamo. I think this is the most dangerous decision that any president has made within 48 hours of his inauguration, he said, saying that torture is singularly responsible for stopping attacks on the U.S. Thiessen listed a long chain of events that were all allegedly sourced to the torture of Abu Zubaydah:
THIESSEN: The CIA developed these alternative interrogation techniques, and all of a sudden he started talking. Zubaydahs information led us to Ramsey bin al Shibh, who was was one of the 9/11 hijackers. Together, they gave us the information that led the capture of KSM. Then, KSM gave us information about another al Qaeda operative, Majid Khan, who was in CIA custody. He told us that Majid Khan had been tasked to give $50,000 to an operative named Zubair, who was developing plots with a Southeast Asian group called JI.
Later, Thiessen bristled in response to a conversation about investigating Bush administration officials for torture. Bushs torturers, he said, are really American heroes:
THIESSEN: Theyre not torturers. Theyre heroes. And the thought that were sitting here discussing whether these people should be prosecuted or investigated is just outrageous. These people are American heroes who saved lives and stopped the next Sept. 11.
Zubaydahs torture is a textbook example of why coercive interrogations do not work. Zubaydah was reportedly driven mentally insane from his torture, and Canadians tossed out evidence from the CIAs interrogations of Zubaydah. In fact, from Zubaydahs interrogations, the U.S. gleaned false information about links between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein.
In calling Bushs torturers heroes, Thiessen is echoing Bill Kristol, who suggested in November that the CIA agents who waterboarded Khalid Sheikh Mohammad receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2009/01/26/35286/mark-thiessen-bush/
Today, in an interview on WAMUs Diane Rehm Show, Thiessen again lashed out at Obama, this time for Obamas executive order closing Guantanamo. I think this is the most dangerous decision that any president has made within 48 hours of his inauguration, he said, saying that torture is singularly responsible for stopping attacks on the U.S. Thiessen listed a long chain of events that were all allegedly sourced to the torture of Abu Zubaydah:
THIESSEN: The CIA developed these alternative interrogation techniques, and all of a sudden he started talking. Zubaydahs information led us to Ramsey bin al Shibh, who was was one of the 9/11 hijackers. Together, they gave us the information that led the capture of KSM. Then, KSM gave us information about another al Qaeda operative, Majid Khan, who was in CIA custody. He told us that Majid Khan had been tasked to give $50,000 to an operative named Zubair, who was developing plots with a Southeast Asian group called JI.
Later, Thiessen bristled in response to a conversation about investigating Bush administration officials for torture. Bushs torturers, he said, are really American heroes:
THIESSEN: Theyre not torturers. Theyre heroes. And the thought that were sitting here discussing whether these people should be prosecuted or investigated is just outrageous. These people are American heroes who saved lives and stopped the next Sept. 11.
Zubaydahs torture is a textbook example of why coercive interrogations do not work. Zubaydah was reportedly driven mentally insane from his torture, and Canadians tossed out evidence from the CIAs interrogations of Zubaydah. In fact, from Zubaydahs interrogations, the U.S. gleaned false information about links between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein.
In calling Bushs torturers heroes, Thiessen is echoing Bill Kristol, who suggested in November that the CIA agents who waterboarded Khalid Sheikh Mohammad receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WRT to your final question: imperial cynicism explains the co-morbid torture approval and
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#35
And then breeds a generation of families harmed by the US and therefore arm against the US.
Fearless
Jan 2015
#37
You make a good point. The country IS sick. We've surrendered completely to the lowest and worst
calimary
Jan 2015
#13
This is exactly my opinion and what I am going to talk about on my radio show tonight. nt
stevenleser
Jan 2015
#32
Isn't it funny that we're willing to execute people for doing the same thing?
sinkingfeeling
Jan 2015
#9
How can you blame Diane Feinstein for the twisted thinking of American voters? nt
kelliekat44
Jan 2015
#11
jesus was tortured so that oughta be a good enough reason to torture "terrorists". after all they
msongs
Jan 2015
#14
OT a bit but Michael Morell and Michael Hayden remind me of Heydrich. Each should be in the
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#36
+1 as I posted above the numbers Balloon Juice posted are not even close to
SomethingFishy
Jan 2015
#29
Thiessen says the investigation was "six sordid years of Democratic demagoguery and investigations"
bigtree
Jan 2015
#19
Pretending that "America" supports torture because somebody asked 1000 people...
countryjake
Jan 2015
#39
"Death to America" is more than a meme that is largely self-inflicted by so-called leaders K&R
bobthedrummer
Jan 2015
#27
Correction: it still is all those things. It's our origin story, still pllaying out.
arcane1
Jan 2015
#59
I think it's a pipe dream to think that anyone in the CIA or Bush Admin will be charged
Kaleva
Jan 2015
#45
Wow, you'd torture someone just for show, knowing that it doesn't protect anyone?
arcane1
Jan 2015
#58
You think torturing KSM was OK, would do it again even though NO credible info was
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#53