Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
15. Marc Thiessen is an asshole.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:22 PM
Jan 2015
Marc Thiessen: Brennan must defend CIA’s terrorist interrogation program
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/marc-thiessen-brennan-must-defend-cias-terrorist-interrogation-program/2014/04/07/ba0382d2-ba7f-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html

It is clear that Feinstein and the Democrats on the Intelligence Committee don’t understand the value of interrogation, because they failed to question one single CIA official involved with the program as part of their investigation. How you do issue a 6,300-page report on a CIA program without even speaking to the people who actually ran the program? It would be as if the 9/11 Commission (which, by the way, relied on CIA interrogations for one-quarter of all its footnotes) had failed to question one single senior government official in determining what went wrong on Sept. 11, 2001. Why on Earth would Feinstein fail to interview the CIA officials she presumes to sit in judgment of and fail to hear their side of the story — unless, of course, she was not interested in their side of the story?

This past week, Obama’s former deputy CIA director, Michael Morell, gave an interview to Charlie Rose in which he vigorously defended the effectiveness of the interrogation program. “I’ve really studied this, and I believe the techniques were effective,” Morell declared. “I’ve looked at the information provided by detainees prior to the techniques and the information provided after the use of the techniques. . . . The information prior to the techniques was limited, vague, not specific. After the techniques? Volumes of information, specific, actionable. There is a big difference.”

Morell explained how Khalid Sheik Mohammed’s questioning was critical to the successful effort to find Osama bin Laden. “When we questioned {KSM} about Abu Ahmed, the courier who eventually took us to bin Laden, he denied knowing Abu Ahmed. When he went back to his cell, we were monitoring him, and we heard him tell other detainees ‘don’t say anything about the courier.’ ” KSM’s efforts to protect the courier are what alerted the agency to his importance — and eventually led the agency to bin Laden’s lair in Abbottabad.

Former CIA director Mike Hayden has been even more blunt, comparing “interrogation deniers” like Feinstein to “birthers” who deny that Obama is an American citizen and to 9/11 “truthers” who claim that 9/11 was a Bush administration plot.


Former Bush Speechwriter: CIA Torturers Are ‘American Heroes’
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2009/01/26/35286/mark-thiessen-bush/

Today, in an interview on WAMU’s Diane Rehm Show, Thiessen again lashed out at Obama, this time for Obama’s executive order closing Guantanamo. “I think this is the most dangerous decision that any president has made within 48 hours of his inauguration,” he said, saying that torture is “singularly responsible” for stopping attacks on the U.S. Thiessen listed a long chain of events that were all allegedly sourced to the torture of Abu Zubaydah:

THIESSEN: The CIA developed these alternative interrogation techniques, and all of a sudden he started talking. Zubaydah’s information led us to Ramsey bin al Shibh, who was was one of the 9/11 hijackers. Together, they gave us the information that led the capture of KSM. Then, KSM gave us information about another al Qaeda operative, Majid Khan, who was in CIA custody. He told us that Majid Khan had been tasked to give $50,000 to an operative named Zubair, who was developing plots with a Southeast Asian group called JI.
Later, Thiessen bristled in response to a conversation about investigating Bush administration officials for torture. Bush’s torturers, he said, are really “American heroes”:

THIESSEN: They’re not torturers. They’re heroes. … And the thought that we’re sitting here discussing whether these people should be prosecuted or investigated is just outrageous. These people are American heroes who saved lives and stopped the next Sept. 11.

Zubaydah’s torture is a textbook example of why coercive interrogations do not work. Zubaydah was reportedly driven mentally insane from his torture, and Canadians tossed out evidence from the CIA’s interrogations of Zubaydah. In fact, from Zubaydah’s interrogations, the U.S. gleaned false information about links between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein.

In calling Bush’s torturers “heroes,” Thiessen is echoing Bill Kristol, who suggested in November that the “CIA agents who waterboarded Khalid Sheikh Mohammad” receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's accurate. PDittie Jan 2015 #1
The part about Democrats is most concerning ybbor Jan 2015 #12
Actually it's not even close... SomethingFishy Jan 2015 #28
WRT to your final question: imperial cynicism explains the co-morbid torture approval and KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #35
Article VI Bobcat Jan 2015 #2
Heart of Darkness reference Fairgo Jan 2015 #47
That is the sound of freedom dying Central Scruitinizer Jan 2015 #3
The problem is that torture NEVER benefits the country Fearless Jan 2015 #4
Whattaya mean? Torture works great! tclambert Jan 2015 #17
And then breeds a generation of families harmed by the US and therefore arm against the US. Fearless Jan 2015 #37
It wasn't a debate Roy Rolling Jan 2015 #5
When tea-baggers say "I want my country back" ... phantom power Jan 2015 #7
nor was there prior debate tiny elvis Jan 2015 #21
I disagree with part of this... hughee99 Jan 2015 #6
No the "it did not work" has a secondary purpose. zeemike Jan 2015 #20
i don't consider this Feinstein's fault or failure. barbtries Jan 2015 #8
You make a good point. The country IS sick. We've surrendered completely to the lowest and worst calimary Jan 2015 #13
+1 zeemike Jan 2015 #22
Agreed Shamash Jan 2015 #23
Welcome to DU, Shamash! calimary Jan 2015 #40
Thank you Shamash Jan 2015 #42
The timing was awful yeoman6987 Jan 2015 #30
This is exactly my opinion and what I am going to talk about on my radio show tonight. nt stevenleser Jan 2015 #32
Isn't it funny that we're willing to execute people for doing the same thing? sinkingfeeling Jan 2015 #9
There was no time bomb. grahamhgreen Jan 2015 #10
How can you blame Diane Feinstein for the twisted thinking of American voters? nt kelliekat44 Jan 2015 #11
jesus was tortured so that oughta be a good enough reason to torture "terrorists". after all they msongs Jan 2015 #14
Marc Thiessen is an asshole. OnyxCollie Jan 2015 #15
OT a bit but Michael Morell and Michael Hayden remind me of Heydrich. Each should be in the KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author Alkene Jan 2015 #16
+1 as I posted above the numbers Balloon Juice posted are not even close to SomethingFishy Jan 2015 #29
It doesn't matter if people like it, or even if it "works" . . FairWinds Jan 2015 #18
Thiessen says the investigation was "six sordid years of Democratic demagoguery and investigations" bigtree Jan 2015 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Jan 2015 #24
Anyone who "can't disagree" with Marc A. Thiessen... countryjake Jan 2015 #25
Find a mirror Shamash Jan 2015 #34
Pretending that "America" supports torture because somebody asked 1000 people... countryjake Jan 2015 #39
I stand corrected Shamash Jan 2015 #43
I'm looking at the poll you posted and the poll the OP posted.. SomethingFishy Jan 2015 #54
Thiessen's first mistake is calling it "a debate" as if that matters stevenleser Jan 2015 #26
"Death to America" is more than a meme that is largely self-inflicted by so-called leaders K&R bobthedrummer Jan 2015 #27
Is THIS the question on which "The American People" verdict was judged? MrMickeysMom Jan 2015 #31
A former bush speechwriter is the source of these comments?? Gothmog Jan 2015 #33
If torture is "OK", then what might be off limits?? kentuck Jan 2015 #38
This could change overnight... surrealAmerican Jan 2015 #41
America has become a brute, mean, spiteful JEB Jan 2015 #44
Correction: it still is all those things. It's our origin story, still pllaying out. arcane1 Jan 2015 #59
I think it's a pipe dream to think that anyone in the CIA or Bush Admin will be charged Kaleva Jan 2015 #45
76 percent said they would do it again "to protect the country" quaker bill Jan 2015 #46
Would you do it again to give the illusion of protecting the country? HereSince1628 Jan 2015 #48
yes laraelise Jan 2015 #52
Wow, you'd torture someone just for show, knowing that it doesn't protect anyone? arcane1 Jan 2015 #58
would you do it personally? quaker bill Jan 2015 #60
Torture or interrogation? laraelise Jan 2015 #49
What credible information was obtained by torturing him? uppityperson Jan 2015 #50
I dont know Im not an expert on 9/11 laraelise Jan 2015 #51
You think torturing KSM was OK, would do it again even though NO credible info was uppityperson Jan 2015 #53
Under made-up fantasies based on a tv show. arcane1 Jan 2015 #57
A poll of Americans is useless in this cotext. They'll vote what the tv tells them to vote. arcane1 Jan 2015 #56
We have the FBI, and Army Intelligence. The CIA is not needed for anything. arcane1 Jan 2015 #55
Perhaps you mistakenly logged onto the wrong site? BillZBubb Jan 2015 #61
Nothing like that happened quaker bill Jan 2015 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"we lost the torture...»Reply #15