Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Mike Conway (R-Tex): The Costitution says we have to spend money on defense, not food stamps. [View all]
Last edited Tue Apr 24, 2012, 06:23 PM - Edit history (1)
The Constitution is pretty clear that national defense is something the federal government should provide for and we ought to do it well, answered Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) in the agriculture debate on food stamps. Im not so sure that the Constitution says that many of the other areas that were talking about today have that same priority for the federal government.
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=33532A5A-7A5B-409C-A661-2AF0F549CAB4
Related...
For months, House Republicans have been trying to wriggle out of the agreement they made in August that will force deep cuts in military spending. Now we know how they propose to do it: They will take tens of billions out of programs for the poorest Americans, particularly food stamps, along with health care for the middle class.
The House Agriculture Committee voted on Wednesday to cut $33 billion over the next decade out of food stamps. That would immediately end benefits for two million people, and reduce benefits for the remaining 44 million people who use the program. A family of four would find their benefits lowered by $57 a month beginning in September, according to an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The committee trimmed job training for food-stamp recipients by 72 percent; 280,000 students would no longer be eligible for free meals.
To understand how callous this vote was, consider the choices the committee and the full House could have made. The budget deal reached last August the one Republicans triggered with their disastrous debt-ceiling crisis calls for a painful sequester of $600 billion to both military and domestic spending over a decade. The Republicans could have accepted the military cuts they had agreed to or they could have joined with Democrats in reducing the cuts by raising taxes on the rich.
Instead, the 2013 budget, written by Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, put all the cuts on the domestic side. Representative Mike Conaway, a Texas Republican, explained that the Constitution requires Congress to pay for defense but that food stamps and other domestic programs were lower priorities.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/24/opinion/callous-choices-in-the-house.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20120424
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mike Conway (R-Tex): The Costitution says we have to spend money on defense, not food stamps. [View all]
Scuba
Apr 2012
OP
But it doesn't specify that we need to spend more then the next 10 countries combined
Fresh_Start
Apr 2012
#5
Blockhead -a reason for food stamps and school lunches was to improve the health of the military
haele
Apr 2012
#15
No, the title of my OP does not have an actual quote. The actual quote is in the text.
Scuba
Apr 2012
#19
Have these idiots even READ the constitution or what our founding fathers said?
Initech
Apr 2012
#18