Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 03:25 PM Apr 2012

Mike Conway (R-Tex): The Costitution says we have to spend money on defense, not food stamps. [View all]

Last edited Tue Apr 24, 2012, 06:23 PM - Edit history (1)

“The Constitution is pretty clear that national defense is something the federal government should provide for and we ought to do it well,” answered Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) in the agriculture debate on food stamps. “I’m not so sure that the Constitution says that many of the other areas that we’re talking about today have that same priority for the federal government.”


http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=33532A5A-7A5B-409C-A661-2AF0F549CAB4


Related...



For months, House Republicans have been trying to wriggle out of the agreement they made in August that will force deep cuts in military spending. Now we know how they propose to do it: They will take tens of billions out of programs for the poorest Americans, particularly food stamps, along with health care for the middle class.

The House Agriculture Committee voted on Wednesday to cut $33 billion over the next decade out of food stamps. That would immediately end benefits for two million people, and reduce benefits for the remaining 44 million people who use the program. A family of four would find their benefits lowered by $57 a month beginning in September, according to an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The committee trimmed job training for food-stamp recipients by 72 percent; 280,000 students would no longer be eligible for free meals.

To understand how callous this vote was, consider the choices the committee and the full House could have made. The budget deal reached last August — the one Republicans triggered with their disastrous debt-ceiling crisis — calls for a painful sequester of $600 billion to both military and domestic spending over a decade. The Republicans could have accepted the military cuts they had agreed to or they could have joined with Democrats in reducing the cuts by raising taxes on the rich.

Instead, the 2013 budget, written by Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, put all the cuts on the domestic side. Representative Mike Conaway, a Texas Republican, explained that the Constitution requires Congress to pay for defense but that food stamps and other domestic programs were lower priorities.



http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/24/opinion/callous-choices-in-the-house.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20120424

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As I understand it CJCRANE Apr 2012 #1
Exactly right. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #3
"the Founding Fathers were mostly against having a standing army" 4th law of robotics Apr 2012 #21
In Guns vs. Butter, Guns win again! gratuitous Apr 2012 #2
Funny, it says as much about general welfare as it does about defense. sinkingfeeling Apr 2012 #4
Yeah but defense is first! hootinholler Apr 2012 #11
But it doesn't specify that we need to spend more then the next 10 countries combined Fresh_Start Apr 2012 #5
the constitution requires what? atheous Apr 2012 #6
BS. Health and Education are Defense. A starving or undernourished Downwinder Apr 2012 #7
I think the Founding Fathers would be aghast if they saw our country today Hugabear Apr 2012 #8
Too broad a brush, Hamilton would have welcomed it. Downwinder Apr 2012 #10
Correction - MOST of the Founding Fathers would have been aghast Hugabear Apr 2012 #14
Hamilton was an ass. white_wolf Apr 2012 #23
If Hamilton hadn't supplied pistols with rigged sights, Downwinder Apr 2012 #24
the constitution also says you have to spend money on post offices. unblock Apr 2012 #9
Hah! Good one. Beat me to it - n/t coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #17
All it takes CJCRANE Apr 2012 #12
If you don't spend money on food stamps all the poor kids will starve tularetom Apr 2012 #13
Blockhead -a reason for food stamps and school lunches was to improve the health of the military haele Apr 2012 #15
Is that an actual quote of a statement made by Conway onenote Apr 2012 #16
No, the title of my OP does not have an actual quote. The actual quote is in the text. Scuba Apr 2012 #19
Then why not take the quotations off of your OP title? onenote Apr 2012 #22
Done, thanks. Scuba Apr 2012 #27
It is kinda misleading 4th law of robotics Apr 2012 #25
Done, thanks. Scuba Apr 2012 #28
+1 4th law of robotics Apr 2012 #33
Have these idiots even READ the constitution or what our founding fathers said? Initech Apr 2012 #18
Remember that's the first thing Boner had them do in 2010? savalez Apr 2012 #20
That was a truly arrogant epic fail. Apparently it didn't sink in. Initech Apr 2012 #26
Welfare is in the Constitution. Alexander Apr 2012 #29
I don't think the Constitution says anything about "spending money"... kentuck Apr 2012 #30
The Constitution states that I am entitled to $4 billion dollars. chrisa Apr 2012 #31
Does the constitution say anything about paying this douchebag a salary? randome Apr 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mike Conway (R-Tex): The...