Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,705 posts)
2. Certainly for electricity generation
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 02:43 PM
Jan 2015

Fuel alternatives are tougher unless you effectively electrify most transportation options... but that doesn't mean that something like this can't help with traditional fuels as well.

For instance, one of the advantages of this specific design is that it operates at a much higher temperature (which means that it doesn't need to be pressurized and is more efficient at converting heat to electricity (probably 50%+ instead of ~33% for current reactors). This higher temperature (combined with the much smaller size) allows them to be installed closer to the point of use, but also allows them to be installed so that their waste heat can supply process heat to industrial processes. So instead of burning tar sands up in canada to cook out the liquids... you could use one of these.

They could also make seawater desalination a bit easier.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nuclear Power Turns To Sa...»Reply #2