General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Insulting Muhammad is not hate speech [View all]38 I am the Lords servant, Mary answered. May your word to me be fulfilled. Then the angel left her.
Why hey there, whatever could that be? You should really try reading further next time, it might help
Man, the age of consent thing was a goof. I brought it up to make you realize just how silly your e-lawyering looks when compared to actual facts. I didn't realize you'd double down on it. That was my mistake. Since it was my mistake, I'll give you a very quick answer. Age of consent laws deal with penetration.* Since there was no penetration in this case, your entire rant about Mary being underage is completely irrelevant. You did know that, right? See, maybe they don't teach it in e-law school, but for a charge to stick, there has to be a real foundation in the law. It's asinine to even have to mention all this, because, like I said, it was a goof.
Now, I get that you're going to try to double down on this and continue to prove that you have a point. Save your time. We're done here. There's no clever points left to be made, no more goalposts to move, and no more jokes to be missed. Have a nice day.
*Generally speaking, they deal with penetration. It actually depends on how the particular law in question defines the particular act that is prohibited. It's simpler to use penetration as a shorthand, rather than prohibited practice, but I wanted to make this clear so that there's no misunderstanding. In short, the issue is the particular practices that may be prohibited by law due to age.