Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"Norway Didn't Give in to Islamophobia, nor should France" [View all]
Norway Didn't Give in to Islamophobia, nor should FranceThree and a half years ago, the far-right Norwegian terrorist Anders Breivik bombed Oslo, and then gunned down dozens of young people on the island of Utøya. His rationalisation for the atrocity was to stop the Islamisation of Norway: that the Norwegian left had opened the countrys doors to Muslims and diluted its Christian heritage. But Norways response was not retribution, revenge, clampdowns. Our response is more democracy, more openness, and more humanity, declared the prime minister Jens Stoltenberg. When Breivik was put on trial, Norway played it by the book. The backlash he surely craved never came.
Heres how the murderers who despicably gunned down the journalists and cartoonists of Charlie Hebdo do not want us to respond. Vengeance and hatred directed at Muslims as a whole serves Islamic fundamentalists well. They want Muslims to feel hated, targeted and discriminated against, because it increases the potential well of support for their cause. Already, there are multiple reports of attacks in France against mosques, and even a criminal explosion in a kebab shop. These are not just disgraceful, hateful acts. Those responsible are sticking to the script of the perpetrators. They are themselves de facto recruiting sergeants for terrorists.
Social media abounds with Islamophobes seizing this atrocity to advance their hatred. Islam as an entire religion is responsible, they cry: it is incompatible with western values. They wish to homogenise Muslims, as though Malala and Mo Farah have anything in common with the sectarian murderers of Isis. Most victims of Islamic extremists are of course themselves Muslims: including Ahmed Merabet, the French police officer killed at close range by the terrorists in Paris yesterday.
This is a dangerous moment. Anti-Muslim prejudice is rampant in Europe. The favoured target of Europes far-right like Frances Front National, which currently leads in the opinion polls is Muslims. France is home to around 5 million Muslims, who disproportionately live in poverty and unemployment, often in ghettoised banlieues. This incident should rightfully horrify, but it will now undoubtedly fuel an already ascendant far-right.
Heres how the murderers who despicably gunned down the journalists and cartoonists of Charlie Hebdo do not want us to respond. Vengeance and hatred directed at Muslims as a whole serves Islamic fundamentalists well. They want Muslims to feel hated, targeted and discriminated against, because it increases the potential well of support for their cause. Already, there are multiple reports of attacks in France against mosques, and even a criminal explosion in a kebab shop. These are not just disgraceful, hateful acts. Those responsible are sticking to the script of the perpetrators. They are themselves de facto recruiting sergeants for terrorists.
Social media abounds with Islamophobes seizing this atrocity to advance their hatred. Islam as an entire religion is responsible, they cry: it is incompatible with western values. They wish to homogenise Muslims, as though Malala and Mo Farah have anything in common with the sectarian murderers of Isis. Most victims of Islamic extremists are of course themselves Muslims: including Ahmed Merabet, the French police officer killed at close range by the terrorists in Paris yesterday.
This is a dangerous moment. Anti-Muslim prejudice is rampant in Europe. The favoured target of Europes far-right like Frances Front National, which currently leads in the opinion polls is Muslims. France is home to around 5 million Muslims, who disproportionately live in poverty and unemployment, often in ghettoised banlieues. This incident should rightfully horrify, but it will now undoubtedly fuel an already ascendant far-right.
It is totally irresponsible for anyone to blame all Muslims for this terrible act. Feeding the Far Right hatred for Muslims in Europe.
As the article says, already their have been stupid, violent retaliatory acts against innocent Muslims fueled by Islamophobics.
Norway handled it the right way. Not giving the Far Right Terrorist what he had hoped for. And not seeking revenge. I do remember their PM telling the world they would not react with fear. That was such a refreshing thing to hear in our fearful world.
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes it is, that is what people ought to be doing, especially here on this democratic site.
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#5
Folks keep bringing up this One True Scotsman thing. I fully understand it, I have no idea why it is
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#18
Of course, "MILLIONS of Muslims" - out of well over a billion - could be less than 1% of them.
pampango
Jan 2015
#19
Adding "phobia" to the end of the word Islam does not make it immune from analysis or criticism.
Throd
Jan 2015
#2
And you make my point. Blaming all Muslims for the actions of fanatics is how this country
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#84
That wasn't my point at all. The point was, you are included in the blame aimed at the West
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#87
"Norway’s enlightened response could be a model elsewhere in Europe too. It would be the last thing
pampango
Jan 2015
#3
So in your opinion all 1.6 billion Muslims hold the same views? I'm not sure what you are saying
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#9
You must not have had any interaction with Muslims. From different countries.
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#14
the Reformation was a disaster for gays and women and launched waves of war and persecution
MisterP
Jan 2015
#52
Do you think there's bigotry against Muslims? If so, what would you call it?
Violet_Crumble
Jan 2015
#80
I thought the connection was made pretty well. Maybe if we substituted Muslims
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#12
They want you to hate a few of them and cause a war on all of them...do not give them what they want.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#21
So...you think their "belief system", or, decoded, "religion", justifies murder? Code words are easily cracked.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#31
Thanks for registering, jumping in, and explaining nothing, looks like that was your purpose...you
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#65
Norway? You mean that socialist democracy? But they don't care about bootstraps or freedoms or
valerief
Jan 2015
#17
We support those who are causing the suffering. Some of our best allies are and have been
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#41
Murder was committed, mass murder. Three suspects have been named. That is all. If you want to
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#47
Yes, and some of the Muslims I have spoken to despise those leaders and the fundies
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#50
He's not at all unique in standing up to tyrants and he was in a fairly safe place by the time
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#54
Well, I am impressed by Rushdie, cheifly because he is an excellent novelist
cemaphonic
Jan 2015
#58
You totally missed the point of the article. But that's okay ... the comparison is excellent as it
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#42
No, I think the more important point was made clear. Who cares what idiotic murderous
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#44
So who or what would you blame for our illegal invasion of Iraq, killing over one million
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#60
"Islam" is the sum total of what people who self-describe as Muslims do.
True Blue Door
Jan 2015
#76
Actually the radical right agrees with you. I know, I have engaged them on this very same
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#83