Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does the two-Party system help or hurt our country ?? [View all]kentuck
(111,052 posts)43. I would agree they do not like Democrats...
...but I am not ready to say it is impossible or that we are doomed. We have to think outside the "partisan" box if we are going to change the two-party system, in my opinion. That does not mean you sell out your progressive ideas, it only means that you present them in a more moderate way and be open to cuts that are not necessary. That would show that you are open to compromise but that you are willing to fight for the things that America cares about. I think it would be a winning message.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Duverger's Law would tend to work against a third viable party from emerging here.
Selatius
Apr 2012
#20
The electoral college is the most important problem facing multiparty advocates.
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#21
Even when the people dont like what is happening, I dont believe they recognize
rhett o rick
Apr 2012
#54
The US simply lacks publicly funded elections. That's why we always choose rich people.
Selatius
Apr 2012
#6
I agree and in addition, until we get a huge majority of the population willing to vote to change it
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#9
It hurts badly because at this stage the debate is so damn phony but ever more partisan
TheKentuckian
Apr 2012
#18
It hurts, but it can be fixed with instant run-off voting like the Aussies do it. n/t
Cleita
Apr 2012
#19
I think the electoral college is an insurmountable obstacle to third parties. It has to go first.
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#22
My point is, if a party can't make a credible bid for the White House, getting support for it
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#29
And in that we are in agreement, it is not set up for a Presidential bid, therefore the electoral
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#33
Winning a national campaign would still entail getting support from the same voters. Therefore...
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#40
The GOP changed radically with Reagan. All of the progressive legislation you mentioned is preReagan
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#50
Nope, no specifics. I meant just what I said. You will have frequent centrist coalitions. The issues
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#32
I don't think so. I think the Republicans have successfully brainwashed their folks to the point
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#41
Has nothing to do with Party label. They have thrown out Republicans who voted for these things too
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#44
Which people? Chomsky? Kucinich? Klein? Obama? Clinton? Gravel? Sanders? They are already speaking
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#49
NGU, however we must realize that voting and sending emails isnt enough. nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2012
#66
If you want me to believe that there is hope, you will have to convince me that
rhett o rick
Apr 2012
#53
The "two party system" helps maintain the illusion of democracy in a capitalist state.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Apr 2012
#47