Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #9)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author Enrique Jan 2015 #1
Okaaay. I guess the OP has their answer. 11 Bravo Jan 2015 #6
So the state department approved it but they're still deciding whether to approve? Cali_Democrat Jan 2015 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Enrique Jan 2015 #11
That article does not say the state department approved the pipeline at one point. Cali_Democrat Jan 2015 #12
Is this pay back to McTurtle for the knife in the back. Wellstone ruled Jan 2015 #2
Good luck with that LordGlenconner Jan 2015 #3
that OP sounds correct Enrique Jan 2015 #7
Sure, I suppose anything can happen LordGlenconner Jan 2015 #8
I think he wants a review before he decides for sure mvd Jan 2015 #17
Don't hold your breath shenmue Jan 2015 #4
Assholes like that will likely call it a red herring for whatever they're currently harping about. Ykcutnek Jan 2015 #5
Not very likely Andy823 Jan 2015 #10
You as well as I don't know what the future of the upaloopa Jan 2015 #13
Never said I did know the future Andy823 Jan 2015 #15
No it is not complaining it is trying to do upaloopa Jan 2015 #16
OK Andy823 Jan 2015 #20
Good post, I agree. Thinkingabout Jan 2015 #31
Any chance all that yakking got the president to change his position on the pipeline? n/t hughee99 Jan 2015 #14
From the administration I keep hearing "Veto", and not "of course I'll sign" Sheepshank Jan 2015 #18
There's this from today.. Cha Jan 2015 #19
Yes but, Andy823 Jan 2015 #21
Of course not.. But, that says everything about them and nothing about President Obama. Cha Jan 2015 #22
And this is exactly what I have been hearing from Admin over and over Sheepshank Jan 2015 #24
Those kind of people write their own scripts and seek out clues to support it.. whether they make Cha Jan 2015 #34
There has been no decision on Keystone. former9thward Jan 2015 #27
When I remember hearing all the "yakking" it was quite some time back, hughee99 Jan 2015 #23
yah...it was clear that assumption had to be considered in one direction only Sheepshank Jan 2015 #25
The assumption was that since a department that he's in charge of is pushing for something, hughee99 Jan 2015 #26
Shouldn't you wait until a decision is made? former9thward Jan 2015 #28
Put into context... kentuck Jan 2015 #29
yakking? ellenrr Jan 2015 #30
"Yakking?" No. "Discussion?" Perhaps. ScreamingMeemie Jan 2015 #32
Gosh darn it, I was considering using "screeching", but went with yakking. Sheepshank Jan 2015 #35
There was a lot of yakking that we put pressure on him not approve it... Luminous Animal Jan 2015 #33
because yakking and screeching here on DU makes Obama do anything? Sheepshank Jan 2015 #36
Why do you assume that was the only thing DUers did? Luminous Animal Jan 2015 #37
Very good to hear about your activism. Sheepshank Jan 2015 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Not too long ago, wasn't ...»Reply #11