"In short, he had due process….." (Reply #162)

In the discussion thread: Molly Norris, American Cartoonist and Victim of Terror, and Glenn Greenwald. [View all]

Sat Jan 10, 2015, 01:53 PM

162. "In short, he had due process….."

Interesting choice of words in your interpretation. I'm done dancing with them. That last bit and your lawyering was all I had to hear on this subject. All I can say is that I'm glad you don't lawyer for me on my civil liberties.

My ignore list is there for reducing the amount of stomach turning on this forum, especially over the most precious superseding law we have, which is by the way of the French. I so did not appreciated your stalking me over the threads and then after all of that, coming up with THIS gem:

From YOUR quote to the devil's ear… "Anwar Awlaki was given the due process he was entitled to."

What the FUCK is THIS shit?

Never mind… rhetorical question, because you're out. Good-bye and good luck lawyering with THAT credo!

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

184 replies	Author	Time	Post
Molly Norris, American Cartoonist and Victim of Terror, and Glenn Greenwald. [View all]	msanthrope	Jan 2015	OP
Greenwald's agenda and the truth are two distinct things. eom	MohRokTah	Jan 2015	#1
I just took a look at French media....AQAP might be behind the shooting..Awlaki's old crew...	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#4
Good stuff...kick	Blue_Tires	Jan 2015	#2
oh sure nt	grasswire	Jan 2015	#28
Par for the course for that guy.	zappaman	Jan 2015	#3
You know, I was criticized for calling out Greenwald's representation of Nazis in civil	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#8
"what political agenda allows for this?" No real agenda.	uhnope	Jan 2015	#44
BOOM! There it is!	Behind the Aegis	Jan 2015	#174
my god, there's something really wrong with Greenwald	uhnope	Jan 2015	#175
K & R. n/t	FSogol	Jan 2015	#5
It's like Greenwald is half asleep when he composes his stuff.	randome	Jan 2015	#6
He's not half-asleep---he counts on his readership to be. nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#9
No opportunity too tasteless to thrash Greenwald eh?	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#7
Indeed....how horrible of me not to take GG's reputation into account before correctly	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#10
Well if ibtimes says so...	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#11
Did they take over the The Wire, too...my source in the OP which reported the hit list in 2013?	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#13
I'm suggesting your interest in the truth	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#15
I will happily debate the truth with you....is there a single fact I've presented you take issue	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#19
My critique	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#22
Indeed....I'm still waiting for your critique. nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#46
I thought it was about "truth".	cheapdate	Jan 2015	#152
what exactly do you contend is untrue in anything she has written here?	bettyellen	Jan 2015	#20
It's the frenzied interpretive dance with facts I take issue with. n/t	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#23
+1	bahrbearian	Jan 2015	#40
Are you sure? Or do you take issue with my description of the 9/11 hijackers? nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#64
What is your description?	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#65
In my OP. nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#67
I see what you called al-Awlaki	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#70
Do you believe they exist? nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#73
Of course	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#74
Just wondering. You seem to have previously described them as "woo."	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#77
Haha I get what you're trying to do	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#82
Ah....so what fact of mine do you dispute? nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#83
To start with	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#87
First, I never contented that we know all we need to know. I think that every single bit of	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#88
Again, it's an opinion, not a fact	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#89
It absolutely is a fact. As a non-custodial member of AQAP, actively engaged in terror, he was	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#91
This is an old Atlantic article that I'll leave for DUers	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#96
Hey--when GG decided to blame Canada for its terrorist shooting a few months ago, did you	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#99
It also rightly questions the bad laws and opinions	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#101
Yeah...I'm really good with how the likes of Bin Laden left the earth. How about you? nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#105
I'm not good with it at all	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#106
Yeah.....just not seeing the downside to Bin Laden's death. Do tell. nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#107
He doesn't get to tell his side of the story in a court of law.	Octafish	Jan 2015	#159
So President Obama hushed up Bin Laden to save the Bushes??? nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#160
No, that's what you wrote.	Octafish	Jan 2015	#161
LOL!	zappaman	Jan 2015	#164
What do you know!	Octafish	Jan 2015	#165
Right?	zappaman	Jan 2015	#166
I thought Democrats cared about Civil Rights, even those with whom they disagree?	Octafish	Jan 2015	#167
"With whom they disagree"?	zappaman	Jan 2015	#168
Is your ignorance intentional, zappaman?	Octafish	Jan 2015	#169
When it comes to "intentional ignorance", I certainly bow to your expertise.	zappaman	Jan 2015	#170
To quote me requires you write ''ignorance intentional,'' zappaman.	Octafish	Jan 2015	#172
Lol!	zappaman	Jan 2015	#173
It indicates what you know about journalism and research, zappaman.	Octafish	Jan 2015	#178
I know not to defend anti-Semites....	zappaman	Jan 2015	#179
Rather defend extrajudicial killing? nt	elias49	Jan 2015	#182
LOL, so you can't defend your accusation. Noted.	bettyellen	Jan 2015	#69
oh please. Anyone reading your posts can see you are projecting	uhnope	Jan 2015	#47
That's about as shameless an attempt to derail a thread I've ever seen	Number23	Jan 2015	#68
interesting.	NewDeal_Dem	Jan 2015	#180
If you took Greenwald's reputation into accout, your post would have been more scathing.	George II	Jan 2015	#43
I would think so too. The only one damaging	arthritisR_US	Jan 2015	#58
Well, any excuse to exploit the dead, I suppose	Scootaloo	Jan 2015	#108
When GG blamed Canada for its terror attack that killed a reservist, did you tell him that?	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#109
I'm talking about you, msanthrope, and your exploitation of murder	Scootaloo	Jan 2015	#110
Oh right--weren't you on that thread, defending Mr. Greenwald? nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#115
I was pointing out the idiocy of several posters and their selective reading ability	Scootaloo	Jan 2015	#123
Which posters were idiots? You seem to have a hypocritical stance--GG can talk about	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#126
^^^	grasswire	Jan 2015	#27
These OPs are useful to me, in that I can watch who "K&R's" them	Maedhros	Jan 2015	#45
I've never recommended a thread before.	OilemFirchen	Jan 2015	#55
Interesting - I too have NEVER done so but just did...	George II	Jan 2015	#71
Why you believe your ignore list	Jeff Rosenzweig	Jan 2015	#56
I'll save you a bit of time. I just Rec'd the OP, so please ...	11 Bravo	Jan 2015	#72
And those supporting murder apologist Glenn Greenwald?	Ikonoklast	Jan 2015	#80
I'm crushed!	greatauntoftriplets	Jan 2015	#84
Let me help you. K&R	Andy823	Jan 2015	#94
Goody. Am I on your ignore list? I have no time for people who fail to use citations and research.	Hekate	Jan 2015	#112
I stand with msanthrope and the facts.	great white snark	Jan 2015	#113
Thank you. nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#146
Put me on ignore	leftynyc	Jan 2015	#177
Thank you for the research, msanthrope. That used to count for something here.	Hekate	Jan 2015	#12
i've been talking about Molly Norris on this site for a few years now....anytime someone posts	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#17
Well done! I could not agree more with your points...	Spazito	Jan 2015	#14
K&R! Good research. Greenwald occasionally says something sensible.	MineralMan	Jan 2015	#18
I might quibble with you as to Greenwald saying something sensible...	Spazito	Jan 2015	#24
I did mean it for the OP, yes. My error.	MineralMan	Jan 2015	#30
Thanks, leaving it does allow more continuity n/t	Spazito	Jan 2015	#34
The GG'S reminds me of the Libertarian ilk...	arthritisR_US	Jan 2015	#60
Yep, his Libertarian roots run deep...	Spazito	Jan 2015	#62
That's the impression he has always left me with.	arthritisR_US	Jan 2015	#78
I remember when Rand Paul was challenged on his comments re the Civil Rights Act...	Spazito	Jan 2015	#81
Peas in a pod, if you ask me. nt	arthritisR_US	Jan 2015	#85
If you did a Venn of the two types you are describing, one circle red, one blue, it would be	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#26
Yes. I think you're correct.	MineralMan	Jan 2015	#32
I truly wonder why someone who has accused the President of killing a terrorist for their	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#21
I wonder why DUers continue to consider his screeds acceptable even lauditory...	Spazito	Jan 2015	#25
Greenwald is very like Newt Gingrich---he sounds like what a smart person is supposed	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#29
Greenwald's thin skin when it comes to criticism mirrors Limbaugh's as well...	Spazito	Jan 2015	#31
He is very thin-skinned. You can tell from both the vitriol, and the screeds he produces in defense	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#35
I have often thought the same...	Spazito	Jan 2015	#38
Yes. I remember the time I referred to him as a libertarian and a	MineralMan	Jan 2015	#48
He's gotta get a thesaurus, or some new material. He beat that term to death in one of his books	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#57
Greenwald is an unstable narcissist	uhnope	Jan 2015	#49
Greenwald is very much like Newt Gingrich. Each	asjr	Jan 2015	#41
This is one of the best posts I've read at DU in a long, long time...	SidDithers	Jan 2015	#16
Post removed	Post removed	Jan 2015	#33
+ a googol	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#37
Apparently not everyone agrees with your praise.	MineralMan	Jan 2015	#50
And on a day when DU is in an uproar over freedom of expression	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#53
Maedhros is so full of freedom of expression s/he made a big deal about who	KittyWampus	Jan 2015	#98
LOL, good point!	Spazito	Jan 2015	#111
You mean that Rajib Karim was unlawfully convicted? The emails between him and Awlaki, presented in	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#42
That poster won't be able to reply to you.	MineralMan	Jan 2015	#52
That is a wonderful portmanteau of "chide" and "hidden." I am going to use it. nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#59
I've used that for years. I think of	MineralMan	Jan 2015	#117
Great post, thanks. Greenwald is a self serving, duplicitous piece of garbage	George II	Jan 2015	#36
K & R	SunSeeker	Jan 2015	#39
KR	uhnope	Jan 2015	#51
So you support summarily executing American citizens with no due process?	alarimer	Jan 2015	#54
I contend that Mr. Awlaki had plenty of due process, and would be more than happy to debate that	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#61
"You make me sick".. Oooops, your words just boomeranged!	Cha	Jan 2015	#75
there is a lot of dishonesty when these things are brought up	JI7	Jan 2015	#63
UNREC	CrawlingChaos	Jan 2015	#66
indeed, when the first thought in the aftermath of such a tragedy	stupidicus	Jan 2015	#76
What makes you think Greenwald isn't here? MM upthread described GG linking to one of his posts.	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#79
plenty	stupidicus	Jan 2015	#90
So when GG used the tragedy of shootings in Canada to say they had it coming.....	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#92
Geez, I totally missed that thread...	Spazito	Jan 2015	#95
Note the hypocrisy....Glenn can blame terrorism on the victims, but I'm the bad person	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#97
Yep, hypocrisy abounds, imo, among those who would defend the indefensible...	Spazito	Jan 2015	#102
that's meaningless garbage	stupidicus	Jan 2015	#103
Wait- we can't critique Greenwald unless he's here to defend himself? Does that logic apply	KittyWampus	Jan 2015	#100
Kitty..I have no doubt GG is here....google "Greenwald" and "sock puppet" and you will read the most	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#104
Yes but according to the "logic" of previous poster we can't critique anyone unless they are here.	KittyWampus	Jan 2015	#128
Note that not a single one of them has provided a dispute of facts? nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#130
I noticed that!	Spazito	Jan 2015	#138
Oh, that has been WELL noted. As well as the attacks on Cali_Dem for daring to post Greenwald's	Number23	Jan 2015	#141
You know, for a long time, blue links were eschewed. I think when you are dealing with GG.....	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#143
good grief	stupidicus	Jan 2015	#149
What an interesting, thought provoking	treestar	Jan 2015	#137
Thank you for once again exposing the ODS of GG that is so entrenched it makes him	Cha	Jan 2015	#86
Thank you, friend. nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#93
Tying this to Greenwald is unseemly	LittleBlue	Jan 2015	#114
Mr. Greenwald had no problem blaming victims of terror......	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#116
Yes, Greenwald made you do it	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#118
Hey--upthread you are avoiding my Bin Laden question. Tell us why you regret his death. nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#120
You know why	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#122
How in the heck did Bin Laden's death destroy the Constitution? nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#127
You're right	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#129
I think John Yoo is an evil motherfucker. So was Bin Laden. nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#131
This message was self-deleted by its author	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#132
So when I wrote this....	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#133
I was self deleting at the moment you were posting	whatchamacallit	Jan 2015	#134
You could have posted this last week or next week	LittleBlue	Jan 2015	#124
yep, that's all crystal clear	stupidicus	Jan 2015	#150
Seconded.	Marr	Jan 2015	#171
Wow, excellent OP, msanthrope.	Bobbie Jo	Jan 2015	#119
The idea that any POTUS of America would have someone murdered over expressing their opinion	Rex	Jan 2015	#121
Well--it's part of the persecution schtick that helps Greenwald get clicks. That...and his general	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#125
Killing a U.S. citizen for exercising free speech is good anger management, is it?	MrMickeysMom	Jan 2015	#135
Wait a second---"finding out what the facts are behind any of these fatwas?"	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#136
Awlaki himself decided not to use the US legal system	treestar	Jan 2015	#139
You forgot...	MrMickeysMom	Jan 2015	#140
"finding out what the facts are behind any of these fatwas"---could you please explain	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#142
Still waiting for you to answer me. nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#155
Yeah, let's not rush to judge these fatwas, LOL!	bettyellen	Jan 2015	#145
Thank you---I'm still trying to get an answer over this! Maybe the poster can clarify what the	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#147
Still waiting for you to answer me. nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#148
Try to be truthful...	MrMickeysMom	Jan 2015	#157
Again, your stance on fatwas seems unclear. Are you saying that Awlaki did not issue a death threat	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#158
"In short, he had due process….."	MrMickeysMom	Jan 2015	#162
Yes..he had due process, and will happily debate you on that point. But again, please clarify	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#163
KICK!	Cha	Jan 2015	#144
kick , this backs up a lot of the stuff coming out today	JI7	Jan 2015	#151
This is more relevant than ever now..	Cha	Jan 2015	#153
Thank you......OMG......Awlaki financed them? And I want to direct you here---	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#154
Kick and rec.	zappaman	Jan 2015	#156
Excellent Op msanthrope.	sheshe2	Jan 2015	#176
Kick...for relevancy...nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#181
Kick--because Awlaki is being whitewashed.....nt	msanthrope	Jan 2015	#183
k	uhnope	Jan 2015	#184

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.