Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I was just talking to a relative, who lives in France. [View all]The Velveteen Ocelot
(130,614 posts)51. "The Last Temptation of Christ" was actually a very good movie
based on a very good book. Scorsese got a Best Director nomination for it, and Ebert gave it four stars. I saw it when it came out (in a theatre that was being picketed by fundies) and I thought it was first-rate. It was not a cheap attempt to be controversial; it was a faithful adaptation of a critically-acclaimed (and frequently-banned) novel. It is possible for something to be both controversial and high-quality. Maybe Charlie Hebdo was just controversial. But neither good nor crappy work ever warrants killing people. It doesn't matter whether the writer was intentionally or just incidentally provocative.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A few news outlets are puffing up the magazine, making it seem more noble than it actually is.
Archae
Jan 2015
#7
I was attacked for saying that it was cheap vulgar humor, but that it might have made a profit.
NYC_SKP
Jan 2015
#10
Let the extremists silence the Charlie Hebdos and they'll come for the more moderate critics next
Fumesucker
Jan 2015
#16
"Attacked for freely expressing a very harmless minority opinion..." There's no irony in that.
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2015
#23
I was attacked for "perceived" victim blaming, people offended by "three innocent victims".
NYC_SKP
Jan 2015
#31
No, not blaming the victims. They assumed risk, but they did not deserve to die.
NYC_SKP
Jan 2015
#37
You call me intellectually lazy accuse me of playing safe then say you won't use insults.
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2015
#40
Yes Lobo27, they went right up to those terrists and forced them to kill twelve peoples!
NYC_SKP
Jan 2015
#44
Yes, the natterers have exhausted me, I am spent, defeated, how could I have been so wrong?
NYC_SKP
Jan 2015
#53
NYC_SKP is now playing the victim card, having successfully made the massacre all about him.
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2015
#68
No you were attacked for blaming the victims of the attack, for stating that they shared some of the
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2015
#67
Careful! Thinking the cartoons are unfunny can make you a terrorist sympathizer around here.
arcane1
Jan 2015
#11
circulation numbers i've seen were 30,000-45,000. for a paris magazine, it's very small time.
NewDeal_Dem
Jan 2015
#24
Extremist Christians in Paris firebombed a Martin Scorsese film in 1988. The quality of the work
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2015
#25
Ummmm, OK. That shouldn't change anyone's views of the murders in the slightest.
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#34