Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,247 posts)
3. They weren't that popular.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:15 PM
Jan 2015

Not sure that means "not self-sustaining." Lots of publications are small but self-sustaining.

And it's not like this report is really a report. It's hearsay in an interview and the interviewee is recalling something he read, without attribution or confirmation or even a claim of expert knowlege.

The guy may be remembering one of the recent reports like this-- http://www.mediaite.com/online/charlie-hebdo-may-receive-government-funding/

While the URL says "government funding" it also mentions private funding. No mention of it before the recent attack. Then again, the place was firebombed before, and possibly given funds to help rebuild.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"they got subsidized...»Reply #3