General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you don't think these people represent all Christians.... [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)ignoring the man whose name they have chosen as their symbolic leader. It would be like Alexander the Great calling himself a Ghandi supporter.
Christ never promoted killing people in wars. So how they chose HIM as their symbol is beyond me.
And it may come as a surprise to those who think religious people in general spend their days wondering if everything they do corresponds with their religion. Most people disagree with many things their religion may require of them. They are not frightened by the threats of eternal damnation if they don't live like medieval monks. They take the good from their religions, and try to do the best they can to be decent humans, assuming that overall, THAT is what is required of them.
Jesus was a Social Democrat, a Liberal who believed in Social Safety nets. Free HC, food for the hungry, free of charge etc. His 'followers' are against pretty much everything he stood for.
They need a different symbolic name. Can't think of one off the bat, but it amazes me that War Mongers and anti-Minority, anti Social Programs for the poor, the elderly and disabled still insist that Jesus, as Bush stated as he led the country into a crusade in the ME, 'is my Hero'. Are they nuts?