Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A comment I just posted to a NY Times article about de Blasio's "missteps" [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)14. They are claiming to speak for the officers
so they could apologize on behalf of their officers that, say, use an illegal chokehold that kills an unarmed man who's horrible crime was asking what the police were arresting him for.
They could also apologize for their officers that, say, shoot someone in a dark stairwell.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A comment I just posted to a NY Times article about de Blasio's "missteps" [View all]
markpkessinger
Jan 2015
OP
A union does not lose legitimacy, legal or moral, because you do not like their politics.
branford
Jan 2015
#12
People hate unions because employers tired of paying union wages invested a lot in
merrily
Jan 2015
#29
Should all unions apologize when a member commits a bad act, or only the police unions?
branford
Jan 2015
#19
In this case, the union is acting like a bunch of spoiled children. They are offended because
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#25
The union has the right to defend its member especially if it argues that the charge against the
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#27
Great letter. They are like whining two year olds and all they've done so far is prove that we
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#8
Good points. And if the NYPD's tantrum was about not being appreciated, that would be
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#24
That is not the first amendment then. That may be a separate contractual thing
Lucky Luciano
Jan 2015
#49
The Mayor acts for the taxpayers, who are the employers of both the Mayor and the NYPD.
merrily
Jan 2015
#32
Not the taxpayers, the voters. All the voters who hopefully are all the people.
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#35
Inside or outside, it was still a family funeral and protests were inappropriate, IMO.
merrily
Jan 2015
#39
Sure seemed as though you were, as do most of your other posts about the police,
merrily
Jan 2015
#41
Acknowledging that the police have a legal right as citizens and unionized public employees
branford
Jan 2015
#42
Straw man. That is not what you said, nor did I say a thing about police not having a legal right
merrily
Jan 2015
#43
I have not followed your posts, but I have noted several of them while reading a few police threads
merrily
Jan 2015
#45
The only union I've seen you supporting are the cops, I don't remember your outcry as our own party
TheKentuckian
Jan 2015
#57