Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What's the difference between Bob Graham and the Clintons on the Iraq fiasco? Honest truth. [View all]madfloridian
(88,117 posts)1. What I Knew Before the Invasion..Bob Graham 2005
What I Knew Before the Invasion
Lots more at the link.
I, too, presumed the president was being truthful -- until a series of events undercut that confidence.
In February 2002, after a briefing on the status of the war in Afghanistan, the commanding officer, Gen. Tommy Franks, told me the war was being compromised as specialized personnel and equipment were being shifted from Afghanistan to prepare for the war in Iraq -- a war more than a year away. Even at this early date, the White House was signaling that the threat posed by Saddam Hussein was of such urgency that it had priority over the crushing of al Qaeda.
In the early fall of 2002, a joint House-Senate intelligence inquiry committee, which I co-chaired, was in the final stages of its investigation of what happened before Sept. 11. As the unclassified final report of the inquiry documented, several failures of intelligence contributed to the tragedy. But as of October 2002, 13 months later, the administration was resisting initiating any substantial action to understand, much less fix, those problems.
At a meeting of the Senate intelligence committee on Sept. 5, 2002, CIA Director George Tenet was asked what the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) provided as the rationale for a preemptive war in Iraq. An NIE is the product of the entire intelligence community, and its most comprehensive assessment. I was stunned when Tenet said that no NIE had been requested by the White House and none had been prepared. Invoking our rarely used senatorial authority, I directed the completion of an NIE.
Lots more at the link.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What's the difference between Bob Graham and the Clintons on the Iraq fiasco? Honest truth. [View all]
madfloridian
Jan 2015
OP
Warren and Sanders vote on ISIS Resolution is the reason I would not vote for either of them.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#7
You are right, no one is perfect but for some one thing wrong prevents a vote, so there you are.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#27
I did not say refuse to vote, some actions taken by candidates just may send my vote elsewhere.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#36
Actually i was e replying to Post #2, and yes I believe if one sits on their duff and does not make
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#39
Just to be plain spoken, Bush had every intention on invading Iraq before he was elected, he had to
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#4
I do believe those who voted yes to the Iraq invasion must be reminded over and over.
madfloridian
Jan 2015
#8
And we should at the same time remind everyone Bush pulled the invasion of
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#9
And in this thread Bush gets a pass, does this mean everyone who did not come
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#26
You got it reversed, I said Bush was the vote to invade Iraq, he planned it before he was president
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#29
If you think they should jump out on him ok, I do not know it is necessary for my good but whatever.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#32
You can discount her failure to vote no, Bush gave the go ahead, if she would have voted no he would
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#12
Plain speaking, the vote in the Senate was 77 yes votes and 23 no, as I stated before it would not
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#15
A no vote might have made Hillary president 6 years ago. Now, she'll never be president.
w4rma
Jan 2015
#17
It does not matter if it would have changed the outcome. Read her words in the OP.
madfloridian
Jan 2015
#18
To be clear, Bush would not have gotten his way if more had stood up to him.
madfloridian
Jan 2015
#34
"Bush would not have gotten his way if more had stood up to him." = exactly. I still remember
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#43
Senator Bob Graham: The CIA Made Up Two Briefing Sessions. Emptywheel blog.
madfloridian
Jan 2015
#20
"the Clintons of all people should have known better given Bill's fairly recent access"
madfloridian
Jan 2015
#46