Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What's the difference between Bob Graham and the Clintons on the Iraq fiasco? Honest truth. [View all]madfloridian
(88,117 posts)35. My post does NOT encourage anyone to refuse to vote.
I have never done that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What's the difference between Bob Graham and the Clintons on the Iraq fiasco? Honest truth. [View all]
madfloridian
Jan 2015
OP
Warren and Sanders vote on ISIS Resolution is the reason I would not vote for either of them.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#7
You are right, no one is perfect but for some one thing wrong prevents a vote, so there you are.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#27
I did not say refuse to vote, some actions taken by candidates just may send my vote elsewhere.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#36
Actually i was e replying to Post #2, and yes I believe if one sits on their duff and does not make
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#39
Just to be plain spoken, Bush had every intention on invading Iraq before he was elected, he had to
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#4
I do believe those who voted yes to the Iraq invasion must be reminded over and over.
madfloridian
Jan 2015
#8
And we should at the same time remind everyone Bush pulled the invasion of
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#9
And in this thread Bush gets a pass, does this mean everyone who did not come
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#26
You got it reversed, I said Bush was the vote to invade Iraq, he planned it before he was president
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#29
If you think they should jump out on him ok, I do not know it is necessary for my good but whatever.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#32
You can discount her failure to vote no, Bush gave the go ahead, if she would have voted no he would
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#12
Plain speaking, the vote in the Senate was 77 yes votes and 23 no, as I stated before it would not
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#15
A no vote might have made Hillary president 6 years ago. Now, she'll never be president.
w4rma
Jan 2015
#17
It does not matter if it would have changed the outcome. Read her words in the OP.
madfloridian
Jan 2015
#18
To be clear, Bush would not have gotten his way if more had stood up to him.
madfloridian
Jan 2015
#34
"Bush would not have gotten his way if more had stood up to him." = exactly. I still remember
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#43
Senator Bob Graham: The CIA Made Up Two Briefing Sessions. Emptywheel blog.
madfloridian
Jan 2015
#20
"the Clintons of all people should have known better given Bill's fairly recent access"
madfloridian
Jan 2015
#46