Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Freedom of speech or provocation? [View all]azurnoir
(45,850 posts)109. I do not believe the article blames th cartoonists as some here on DU have been saying but I do find
it rather disturbing that any questioning of the cause and of these horrendous attacks is met with stuff that reminds me of what post 9/11 questioning of America's role in the ME is/was and how that may have contributed was met wih then
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
190 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
i think it brings up another question would we be so je suis charlie and happy theyre
belzabubba333
Jan 2015
#4
Yes, indeed. Right now I hear Huckabee is questioning the Obama daughters morals
randys1
Jan 2015
#177
How does the author, in adjoining sentences, claim the attack has nothing to do with religion
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#12
One of the more disgusting comments I've seen about this: "they did it to themselves"
cali
Jan 2015
#22
Okay, where did the poster say "they did it to themselves"? You put it in quotation marks
KittyWampus
Jan 2015
#45
YOU wrote: they did it to themselves. you can't squirm awayn from that line. it's reprehensible
cali
Jan 2015
#53
So we should walk on eggshells and try to never offend even the most unreasonably sensitive person..
NutmegYankee
Jan 2015
#42
"live on their knees" usually refers to living under some oppressive force. in what sense
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#136
Perhaps next you could provide commentary on short skirts and sexual assault. nt
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#103
wll I didn't alert and I'm glad it wasn't hidden. I think the poster's disgusting victim
cali
Jan 2015
#133
Charlie Hebdo' is a made up title for the publication, not a person's name.
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2015
#143
That's not a broad brush, kid, that's contextualization. Religions regularly denigrate LGBT people
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2015
#112
wowser. you go from ugly victim blaming to even uglier victim blaming. shame on you.
cali
Jan 2015
#99
let me translate for you: He was saying that he was willing to stand up for what he believes
cali
Jan 2015
#130
None of these victim blamers seem to mention the constant, intentional denigration of LGBT people
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2015
#14
I'm utterly opposed to violence of course, but I am stunned that the very same people who criticized
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2015
#126
Our freedoms are not limited to "how bad they get", if they can get bad then we must segregate
TheKentuckian
Jan 2015
#69
Appeasement is ALWAYS horrible. You are conflating appeasement with manners and being respectful
TheKentuckian
Jan 2015
#174
I know exactly what it means and you know in context that it is surrender under threat of violence.
TheKentuckian
Jan 2015
#190
Let's start with the subtitle which was left out of the of the carefully chosen snipettes
azurnoir
Jan 2015
#76
then you must have missed the part where the Hebdo cartoonist was fired for antisemitism
azurnoir
Jan 2015
#87
I guess being fired for antisemitism is a sign of acceptance of that by an entire nation?
azurnoir
Jan 2015
#98
please post then as you're promoting it apparently it could not be a call out
azurnoir
Jan 2015
#107
Obviously I'm on azurnoirs ignore list. Feel free to re-copy my post cali nt
riderinthestorm
Jan 2015
#118
and once again which one of those resulted in the firing of a cartoonist? I'll wait :)
azurnoir
Jan 2015
#90
CH fired the cartoonist who drew anti-Semitic cartoons. We all know that
riderinthestorm
Jan 2015
#95
I do not believe the article blames th cartoonists as some here on DU have been saying but I do find
azurnoir
Jan 2015
#109
And the Bible says to follow Jesus you have to sell all you have and give it to the poor.
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2015
#141
wow from a Rightwing Islamophobic website too, guess tolerance is in the eye of the beholder indeed
azurnoir
Jan 2015
#149
it was pointing out the obvious but to say that means the cartoonists at Hebdo deserved it
azurnoir
Jan 2015
#160
When you say the brainwashing of young minds - do you think children should be allowed in Churchs?
el_bryanto
Jan 2015
#131