Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do Democrats really want a House Minority Leader worth $100 Million? [View all]Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do Democrats really want a House Minority Leader worth $100 Million? [View all]
Renew Deal
Jan 2015
OP
Ok, what's going on here? Why are you saying her wealth is from campaign contributions?
CreekDog
Jan 2015
#37
+ 1. Her policies are what matter, not her net worth. I'm happy if a person can make millions
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#19
She had more than a $100 million then? How much did she put into the DNC and other candidates?
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#77
Reminds me of a joke I once heard told about then-Gov Nelson Rockefeller
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#43
So you think that statement means she cannot remember that her father was mayor of Baltimore?
CreekDog
Jan 2015
#38
Don't change the subject. You just said she didn't remember being the daughter of the Mayor
CreekDog
Jan 2015
#93
Ah, but that week would cement your place in the pantheon for eternity! - nt
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#44
Greed has corrupted both political parties. No wealth will ever be enough,
closeupready
Jan 2015
#10
OK, let's play that out a bit. Not a woman. Not an African-American. Not a descendant of wealth.
pinto
Jan 2015
#74
One of the poorest members of congress recently voted against Wal-Street reform
JonLP24
Jan 2015
#50
Being wealthy isn't the problem. It's the heart and mind behind the pile of cash that matters.
Vinca
Jan 2015
#39
95% of the gains from this so-called 'recovery' have accrued to the top
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#45
I'm sure she'll fight hard to make sure my SS Disability doesn't get cut (from $1000 to $800)
NightWatcher
Jan 2015
#48
If we could only pick non-corporate, anti-trust types for leadership, we might have seven people!
dmosh42
Jan 2015
#49
I'm more concerned about "impeachment is off the table" and "embrace the suck"
TheKentuckian
Jan 2015
#52
what is the precise and relevant money limit that denies knowledge of how ordinary people live...?
LanternWaste
Jan 2015
#59
I would say being within a couple of orders of magnitude of ordinary net wealth
Fumesucker
Jan 2015
#70
A couple of recent threads that touch on the issue of experience vs intellectual knowledge
Fumesucker
Jan 2015
#81
And I was pointing out that without experience you really don't know what's going on
Fumesucker
Jan 2015
#86
So far, Democratic members of the US Congress have wanted exactly that.
Agnosticsherbet
Jan 2015
#76
Greed, WTH, with all the bitching and moaning about someone's wealth and some wants to bring up
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#102
I don't care, just hope she remembers that some of us live on less than $12,000 a year.
Paper Roses
Jan 2015
#103