Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Recursion

(56,582 posts)

1. Why would a renaissance mean more manufacturing jobs?

Reply to nationalize the fed (Original post)

Wed Jan 14, 2015, 06:46 AM

Jan 2015

Our agricultural renaissance meant that people left the farms. We're seeing in industry what happened in agriculture about a century ago.

By outputs, this is the high point of American manufacturing so far. By labor inputs, it's not. We consider the parallel fact about agriculture a good thing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Guardian: The US 'manufacturing renaissance' doesn't exist, says new report [View all] nationalize the fed Jan 2015 OP

Why would a renaissance mean more manufacturing jobs? Recursion Jan 2015 #1

We consider the parallel fact about agriculture a good thing Boreal Jan 2015 #2

But when they left the farms there were factories in the cities. hobbit709 Jan 2015 #3

Manufacturing jobs increased under Carter, Clinton and Obama (since 2010) though pampango Jan 2015 #4

^ nationalize the fed Jan 2015 #5