General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Republicans and their corporate media have their "new Benghazi" with which to bash President Obama [View all]Triana
(22,666 posts)I just had to tweet these to some chest-thumping dufus who was blaming Obama for ISIS:
Fox Hides Bush's Actions To Claim Bush Gave "Visionary" Warning About Islamic State
Fox News accused President Obama of ignoring warnings from President Bush about the ramifications of a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq, claiming that Bush's warnings in 2007 predicted the rise of the Islamic State extremist group. In reality, Obama followed the extended withdrawal timeline that Bush set in 2008 with the approval of military leaders
http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/09/05/fox-hides-bushs-actions-to-claim-bush-gave-visi/200662
Fox News Host Embarrassed By Fact Checkers After Blaming Obama for Bush Mistake
Recently, Fox News Jeanine Pirro tried to claim that President Obama is responsible for the leader of the I.S.I.S., Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, being free. Pirro said, The head of this band of savages is a man named Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, the new Osama Bin Laden. A man released by Obama in 2009, who started ISIS a year later. And when Baghdadi left Camp Bucca, where the worst of the worst were held in Iraq, he threatened his American jailers saying, Ill see you in New York. Just one small problem with that its not true. In fact, it got a rating of False by Politifact. If you want to blame a president for the release of al Baghdadi, the only one you could blame is George W. Bush. Politifact found exactly two possible scenarios behind the release of al Baghdadi and they both point to the Bush administration.
http://www.forwardprogressives.com/fox-news-host-embarrassed-fact-checkers-blaming-obama-bush-mistake/
FACT CHECK: ISIS Leader, Baghdadi, Was Released By Bush, Not Obama
Since the right-wing is so intent on assigning blame for Baghdadis campaign of terror on the president who was in office when he was set free, then according to their logic it is all Bushs fault. But dont expect Fox News to report the facts as laid out by actual journalists. They wont even report the comments of their own witness, Col. King, who appeared on another network (ABC) and admitted that he could be mistaken. It turns out that he never knew the name of the man he presumed to be Baghdadi, he just thought there was a resemblance to the man he encountered. Nor will they report Col. Kings remarks to the Daily Beast where he downplayed the threat posed by Baghdadi, saying that He was a bad dude, but he wasnt the worst of the worst.
PolitiFact went on to note that, even if Col. Kings account were correct, and Baghdadi was still in custody in 2009, Obama still could not be held to blame for Baghdadis release. The terms of the Status of Forces Agreement with Iraq required the U.S. to turn over all prisoners to the custody of Iraqs criminal system. That agreement was negotiated and agreed to by the Bush administration in 2008.
http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=17047
How the Top Iraqi Terrorist Was Helped by a Bush-Signed Agreement
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who heads the jihadists threatening Baghdad, was freed from prison under a deal W. struck with Iraq.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/06/abu-bakr-al-baghdadi-release-george-bush
_ _ _ _ _ _
The chest-thumper on Twitter then criticized my SOURCES ie: "You're quoting Mother Jones as a credible source? HA!"
My response: "You can't argue with the FACTS, so you criticize the source. FAIL."
There it is.