Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dark n Stormy Knight

(10,484 posts)
56. Sorry, but once again I can't see how your response is relevant to my post you were replying to.
Thu Jan 15, 2015, 04:41 PM
Jan 2015

Let's review. I said that it's possible that people who were qualified for disability benefits might not have applied when the economy in general was better.

Say your family has had a good income over the years and you've managed to put away some money. You could pretty easily afford to send you kids to college. You medical insurance wasn't massively expensive. Your pension hadn't been stolen by Wall Street. Your spouse is still working in a well-compensated position.

I say many people would have chosen not to apply for federal disability payments under these conditions. Those are far different conditions from those in which most of us find ourselves nowadays.


So, again, my post was about people who were entitled to disability benefits (for whatever condition) not bothering to apply for them because their financial situation was good enough that they could get by OK without the benefits.

Your main point seems to be that, "The debilitating disease and injury rates are largely independent of the economy." That may be true, but I can't see why you would feel the need to make this point in response to my point. What am I missing?


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They dislike that states use SSI and SSDI to cut their own TANF rolls Recursion Jan 2015 #1
The same people want to deny federal disability payments of any kind are the same people who Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #2
It's not a question of absolute numbers Recursion Jan 2015 #3
I don't see how it could be expected to be separate from the state of the overall economy. Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #4
+1 daleanime Jan 2015 #15
Thank you. Particularly in light of the fact that someone on another thread has interpreted this Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #16
Well, it's kind of personal for me...... daleanime Jan 2015 #22
I know, right!? It's particularly irratating when you have RWers claiming that Obama ruined Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #25
Thanks.... daleanime Jan 2015 #37
If unable to work why would unemployment rate matter? One_Life_To_Give Jan 2015 #40
Either you're replying to a different post, or you're replying to a post which you didn't not read Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #46
Employment rate is a measure of the economy One_Life_To_Give Jan 2015 #54
Sorry, but once again I can't see how your response is relevant to my post you were replying to. Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #56
You say that the lawyers have gotten the ALJ acceptance rate up to 80%. Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #5
You are mistaken on TANF. It is not "state aid". PotatoChip Jan 2015 #18
Thank you! And let's keep on finding and sharing factual information. There are still some Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #48
What you are dtscribing in your first paragraph started when Clinton's welfare reform set time limit jwirr Jan 2015 #39
Hi jwirr Dyedinthewoolliberal Jan 2015 #43
You cannot just transfer them BUT we told them to fill out an application. I was a Social Worker jwirr Jan 2015 #45
Anyone can refer someone to SSDI in that they can tell them about it and how to apply. They will not Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #49
Increased SSI enrollees = result of cuts to welfare under clinton and the worst NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #51
Our nation only has one financial problem .... Scuba Jan 2015 #6
I couldn't agree with you more completley! Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #7
But Grover Norquist feels so good about that. Enthusiast Jan 2015 #11
Even if they are lousy at creating jobs and most of the jobs they create are lousy? Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #30
Ronnie didn't give it a second thought. Enthusiast Jan 2015 #38
+1 LiberalLoner Jan 2015 #20
You couldn't have said that any better!! FiveGoodMen Jan 2015 #44
Yes Fumesucker Jan 2015 #8
Correct... Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #9
I go with yes, no Johonny Jan 2015 #33
I don't know. I think there are lots who know it's a game-- Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #35
Watching them all is like watching Victoria Jackson Johonny Jan 2015 #36
Watching Victoria Jackson an act I can no longer perform. Eeeek. Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #50
They Understand & Loathe Social Programs fredamae Jan 2015 #10
Yes. This fear & loathing and a real knack for propaganda are undeniable. The Republcan party Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #12
Gohmert ;) I don't disagree fredamae Jan 2015 #21
Gohmert, fer sher! I was looking for a good dumb qoute from him, but all that stupid was making me Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #23
"Don't Cast Aspersions on My Asparagus" fredamae Jan 2015 #24
Oh my. I thought you had made that one up just to be hilarious. It's even funnier since it's true! Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #26
Nope-lol-it's all real fredamae Jan 2015 #31
I'm thinking Tragicomedy. Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #32
Yup-that's the Only choice :) n/t fredamae Jan 2015 #34
K&R! Feigning ignorance is a strategy. Enthusiast Jan 2015 #13
It sucks about 60 Minutes going RW, and I should care more because they reach a wider audience, Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #14
I'd just like to know why the reTHUGliCONS want to kill American poor, disabled and the elderly? bearssoapbox Jan 2015 #17
Bluntly: There is no Corp Profit Value fredamae Jan 2015 #27
Well said. We are talking about levels of greed that I would call downright evil. Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #29
Living on nothing and a Reed Virtue turbinetree Jan 2015 #19
Yep, So many of the wealthy and connected have all sorts of very highly paid positions just given to Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #28
They do know turbinetree Jan 2015 #55
They want to destroy it so are lying. eom TransitJohn Jan 2015 #41
So you think the Republicans would attempt to decieve the masses in order to get what they want? Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #47
Bye, Bye American Pie gerogie2 Jan 2015 #42
If it is routine to reallocate funds then perhaps the trust funds should just be merged. n/t PoliticAverse Jan 2015 #52
Did anyone on here really expect anything different from Republicans? bobGandolf Jan 2015 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do Republicans misunderst...»Reply #56