General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Against my better judgment ... [View all]Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)on our merry march toward full totalitarianism. Charlie Hebdo never attempted to convert anyone to anything; that wasn't the objective of their cartoons. Their objective was to open a dialogue about subjects of their choice.
Religion is an appeal to authority, among other things. In a Western style democratic society, questioning authority is accepted and even encouraged, and is often best accomplished by ridicule. In a free society, the "right to not be offended by another person's free speech" is not recognized. (I exclude hate speech laws and libel laws as being reasonable limits on free speech)
However, in a totalitarian society, a citizen is NOT FREE to offend and ridicule authority, neither religious nor political, and the offense of causing offense is often punished by death.
Whatever complaints you may have about living in a democratic society, (and make no mistake, you've just written one) there is no other system of government yet found that protects the rights of so many of its citizens.