General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DU relentlessly mocks those whose ideas we disagree with [View all]randome
(34,845 posts)Everyone has the right to be angry. I think it's easier to restrict speech that has an actual chance of inciting people to violence or to commit other illegal acts.
Europe has laws against Holocaust denial. (I don't think America does, does it?)
I'm not at all trying to 'defend' language designed to harm someone or some group. But I also think it's a long game we play, 'allowing' such hateful speech while at the same time, society starts to move away from it.
It's similar to how I treat my daughters. If I were to strictly forbid certain things, they would be likely to harden their stance against me and seek out the very behaviors I try to warn them against.
Is there a similar dynamic to allow hate speech until it withers away of its own accord? I don't know.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.[/center][/font][hr]