Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Progressive: The GOP’s new ploy to destroy Social Security [View all]KamaAina
(78,249 posts)38. White House Weighs In On House GOP's New Social Security Ploy
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/white-house-house-gop-social-security-rule
The White House has weighed in publicly for the first time on a House Republican move that could precipitate a fight over Social Security in the next two years.
The House voted last week to block a routine transfer of tax revenue between Social Security's retirement and disability funds; the latter is projected to start being unable to pay full benefits in late 2016, sparking a crisis that advocates warn the GOP could use as leverage to push changes to the program. The rule says a transfer, which had been done 11 times previously under Democratic and Republican administrations, can be done only if there are cost-saving measures attached to it.
In a statement to TPM, the White House said that it generally opposes measures that limit Congress's ability to transfer revenue between the Social Security funds, as the House rule does.
"Generally speaking, the Administration strongly opposes any efforts to undermine Congress ability to reallocate funds between the Social Security retirement and disability trust funds," a White House spokesperson told TPM, "as they have done with bipartisan support numerous times in the past in both directions."
The House voted last week to block a routine transfer of tax revenue between Social Security's retirement and disability funds; the latter is projected to start being unable to pay full benefits in late 2016, sparking a crisis that advocates warn the GOP could use as leverage to push changes to the program. The rule says a transfer, which had been done 11 times previously under Democratic and Republican administrations, can be done only if there are cost-saving measures attached to it.
In a statement to TPM, the White House said that it generally opposes measures that limit Congress's ability to transfer revenue between the Social Security funds, as the House rule does.
"Generally speaking, the Administration strongly opposes any efforts to undermine Congress ability to reallocate funds between the Social Security retirement and disability trust funds," a White House spokesperson told TPM, "as they have done with bipartisan support numerous times in the past in both directions."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let's set the disabled contributors against the elderly contributors and leave the Jamies AlOOONE!
merrily
Jan 2015
#4
I know. I described it in my own words, rather than use the words of the article.
merrily
Jan 2015
#9
In 1776 the biggest concern of London was the Sugar Plantation in the West Indies
happyslug
Jan 2015
#31
Yep. And that is the direction in which our entire society has been heading for some time now.
merrily
Jan 2015
#15
Why on earth are you supposedly agreeing with me? I said nothing like what your post says.
merrily
Jan 2015
#26
OMG the list of bills from the GOP goes on and on, how they are taking away from the people.
sammy750
Jan 2015
#11
If it were only the Republicans, we'd be much better off. Problem is, it's a collaboration.
merrily
Jan 2015
#17
It's their old lie. But Dems can stop them by being united on any attempt to touch SS.
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#36