Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Christians are the world's gravest danger to peace, not Muslims. Christians can kill the planet. [View all]Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)40. So how you you propose sifting the beliefs of religious people
and then deciding when they can or cannot vote/petition/hold office?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Christians are the world's gravest danger to peace, not Muslims. Christians can kill the planet. [View all]
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
OP
I fear the rule of the Holy High Church of Mass Media, America's true masters, they are untouchable.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#2
And now the obvious manipulation to fear an entire other religion...Fearbola was just the dress
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#5
And it was sooo bloody obvious..corporate media was in it's full glory in 2014!
mountain grammy
Jan 2015
#101
President Cruz will never happen, of course not. That would be too scary to think about.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#13
CNN, Fox, most of the mass media and all of the Republicans in Congress would disagree.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#8
CNN is a tough nut to prove, but look at the religion of their TV lineup. Did I say something bad?
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#26
A man who was able to seperate spirituality from political ideology and real world policy. None
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#39
You may be the first person on DU to advocate a religious litmus test for office...
LanternWaste
Jan 2015
#60
Not all, mock their extremist ideas and connect those ideas to their political desires.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#21
'Sorry, but religion threads are not allowed in GD. Please do consider reposting in religion.
hlthe2b
Jan 2015
#18
Complete logic fail. Even most believers don't distort things to this degree to make some
cbayer
Jan 2015
#22
As no one of any consequence or in a position of power is calling for Christian religious beliefs
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#23
There are lots of people calling for that and we have a constitution that prohibits it.
cbayer
Jan 2015
#25
My intent is to mock extremist Christians ideology, it is permitted, within the bounds of not being vulgar.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#27
I am genuinely worried about creeping Maria law, Sharia law xenophobic fake fears are the cover.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#32
And yet the number of atheists in office in those states didn't appreciably change after that ruling
Fumesucker
Jan 2015
#64
Well given the amount of pull the orthodox church has now is what I meant, I didn't mean the
MillennialDem
Jan 2015
#109
We need to look back in history to solve problems....lions* would be my first choice
ChosenUnWisely
Jan 2015
#30
Questioning whether God exists is an exercise in the freaking obvious. It requires no reasoning.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#81
Dawkins can be abrasive at times, but he's a more thoughtful and reasonable man ...
dawg
Jan 2015
#67
Dawkins also grew up in a culture rather less marinaded in fundamentalist religion than our own
Fumesucker
Jan 2015
#68
The fundies do more to drive people away from religion than Mr. Dawkins ever could.
dawg
Jan 2015
#69
You can start your own OP on how extremist Christian religion has nothing to do with politics in America.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#55
Why would I do that, I don't think that Christian fuckery has nothing to do with US politics
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2015
#59
Were they Christians or Muslims ranting on the Internet, which never happens by the way?
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#84
I do not think Christians are like that. Why are you smearing an entire religion using one, single
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#83
It wasn't Christians losing their minds over the lyric change. DU was quite the display of
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#88
To this day I still see no point to the rending of garments that resulted.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#97
I said the lyric change was innocuous. You repeatedly asserted that is was not innocuous
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#99
Okay, fine. It still doesn't explain the zealotry erupting over just a song by some guy especially
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#102
I never said Green was harmed. I said he was the object of vitriol, which he was.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#116
You ask "who was harmed?" then pretend that "justified the vitriol that was unleashed against him"
cleanhippie
Jan 2015
#117
When you call me tone-deaf and then say that is probably too kind then yes,
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#123
How we got from debating the proper use of "innocuous" to an incoherent tale of your "conversion"
cleanhippie
Jan 2015
#124
You started the debate on the definition. I remain content with my use of the word and
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#125
Green's rewrite hardly rises to the level of vitriol directed at Lennon.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#127
"To those that "lost their collective minds" it was more than just one little line"
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#130
All I have seen is statements telling me people are upset, that the song has deep value to them.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#133
Again, where have you explained it? Your comments addressing the song (rather than my vocabulary) --
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#135
Gotta vote with clean hippie on this one. Now to explain how they got from the OP topic to a
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#148
Thank you, corrected. They aethiests are catching up with their weaponry and spending.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#52
Correction noted, did seem entirely out of context. Thanks for the poetry.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#62
Hans was a Christian as the terrorists of Paris were Muslims. Agreed. I like principals.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#82
Due to US intervention. Our coup handed their extremist everything they had
Exultant Democracy
Jan 2015
#118
Obama withdrawing all Christian warriors from Muslim majority lands is not sitting well
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#121
Kill the planet is an overstatement, but I agree with the rest of your point. Christians have done
MillennialDem
Jan 2015
#103
Everything shitty in today's Islam is directly attributable to western imperialism.
Exultant Democracy
Jan 2015
#119
Then you clearly have no knowledge or interest in the actual history of the religion and the region
Exultant Democracy
Jan 2015
#149