Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Atheist Atrocities Fallacy – Hitler, Stalin & Pol Pot [View all]dawg
(10,777 posts)3. I would never try to imply that atheists were more likely to kill or commit acts of brutality.
But I do think it is necessary to push back against the false notion that it is religion itself that causes these things. Religion is a tool that some people use to express their brutality. In the absence of that tool, another is conveniently chosen.
Religion is also a tool that some people use to fight *against* the brutal and unkind parts of their human nature. In the absence of that tool, *these* people will find another tool to help them be better people.
Ultimately, it is not the religion or lack thereof. It is the individual men and women making their own choices about which path they want to follow: the path of kindness, or the path of ruthlessness.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think there is an argument that atheism isn't a motivation in and of itself.
RadiationTherapy
Jan 2015
#9
Without examples, I don't know how to respond other than: Nothing is above mockery.
RadiationTherapy
Jan 2015
#17
You are scornful of people who accuse religious people of taking the bible literally.
Arugula Latte
Jan 2015
#68
And that is the problem, people who believe that because murder, slavery, etc., are in the Bible --
DesertDiamond
Jan 2015
#71
I would never try to imply that atheists were more likely to kill or commit acts of brutality.
dawg
Jan 2015
#3
It's not right to hang any murderous, despotic leader's actions on people of faith either
Major Nikon
Jan 2015
#22
Maybe they did not kill in the name of atheism (though Communists do persecute people of faith)
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#21
Somehow we are to believe they killed those deemed responsible for mocking their religion
Major Nikon
Jan 2015
#54
I'm in sympathy with atheists, as my dad was an atheist, and I'm a Buddhist=no supreme being...
DesertDiamond
Jan 2015
#26
As for buddhist belief in a supreme being, depends on which sect. As for harming others, buddhists
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#52
Sorry you disagree, ND-Dem. Respect for life = Core principle of Buddhism. The subject of the OP
DesertDiamond
Jan 2015
#70
"I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so." - Adolph Hitler, 1941
beam me up scottie
Jan 2015
#58
so you are saying Stalin and Pol Pot were not Atheist? Or are you saying that they did not kill
Douglas Carpenter
Jan 2015
#63