Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So what is it, exactly, that you are trying to deny? dawg Jan 2015 #1
I think the link provided explained it in detail. SamKnause Jan 2015 #5
The link sounded like a lot of self-serving ... dawg Jan 2015 #7
I think there is an argument that atheism isn't a motivation in and of itself. RadiationTherapy Jan 2015 #9
I don't disagree with that. But the same goes for religion. dawg Jan 2015 #11
I have to disagree with the second paragraph to an extent. RadiationTherapy Jan 2015 #12
Atheists and mentally unstable people ... dawg Jan 2015 #13
Without examples, I don't know how to respond other than: Nothing is above mockery. RadiationTherapy Jan 2015 #17
Of course anything can be mocked. dawg Jan 2015 #18
I did not mean to imply mockery is a good idea, helpful or kind. RadiationTherapy Jan 2015 #28
Often claimed but absolutely false whatthehey Jan 2015 #35
There is no nuance in a yes or no poll question. dawg Jan 2015 #36
It appears you didn't click on the link. There were three choices. Luminous Animal Jan 2015 #47
Is the resurrection of Jesus to be taken symbolically? Arugula Latte Jan 2015 #43
Not to me, but maybe to some. dawg Jan 2015 #61
You are scornful of people who accuse religious people of taking the bible literally. Arugula Latte Jan 2015 #68
There are distinct differences, though TexasMommaWithAHat Jan 2015 #25
And that is the problem, people who believe that because murder, slavery, etc., are in the Bible -- DesertDiamond Jan 2015 #71
That is the voice of reason you are channeling there. zeemike Jan 2015 #23
religion and atheism have a body count no roguevalley Jan 2015 #67
We have forums for these kinds of arguments. TM99 Jan 2015 #2
+1 el_bryanto Jan 2015 #10
You have the power of the Holy Trinity at your fingertips. cleanhippie Jan 2015 #19
I would never try to imply that atheists were more likely to kill or commit acts of brutality. dawg Jan 2015 #3
I agree with you jberryhill Jan 2015 #16
I hesitate to intrude but, Neon Gods Jan 2015 #38
No, I don't admit that. dawg Jan 2015 #40
"Unbelievers have killed believers because of their faith." yortsed snacilbuper Jan 2015 #41
Beda Chang. dawg Jan 2015 #60
LOL yortsed snacilbuper Jan 2015 #66
You must not have read the article. F4lconF16 Jan 2015 #49
Thank you for posting. SamKnause Jan 2015 #4
The facts say otherwise. Archae Jan 2015 #6
Yeah. I don't think it's right to hang Hitler on the atheists. dawg Jan 2015 #8
It's not right to hang any murderous, despotic leader's actions on people of faith either Major Nikon Jan 2015 #22
No it isn't. dawg Jan 2015 #27
Except in some instances, religion is used as a means to that end Major Nikon Jan 2015 #30
If you give it the blame for that ... dawg Jan 2015 #33
I'm not sure how to do that Major Nikon Jan 2015 #39
Religion doesn't cause people to kill. It's their faith that does that. immoderate Jan 2015 #62
"Hitchens and other great thinkers" gratuitous Jan 2015 #14
What was that about mocking? F4lconF16 Jan 2015 #50
Sorry gratuitous Jan 2015 #51
"Church of Hitchens" F4lconF16 Jan 2015 #53
Oh, boo hoo hoo gratuitous Jan 2015 #57
Don't dis Hitch! Dr. Strange Jan 2015 #64
How Funny..... Cryptoad Jan 2015 #15
Hitler was a self declared Christian. alphafemale Jan 2015 #20
Hitler and those closest to him were quite contemptuous of Christianity. thucythucy Jan 2015 #76
Maybe they did not kill in the name of atheism (though Communists do persecute people of faith) Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #21
And another strawman whatthehey Jan 2015 #31
Well Put.n/t fasttense Jan 2015 #34
I think you fundamentally misunderstand the nature of religious folk ... dawg Jan 2015 #37
Sorry Neon Gods Jan 2015 #42
Somehow we are to believe they killed those deemed responsible for mocking their religion Major Nikon Jan 2015 #54
Well, duh. Religion never has anything to do with the bad stuff. beam me up scottie Jan 2015 #65
Stalin of course did not want people having a god treestar Jan 2015 #46
Not historically accurate Major Nikon Jan 2015 #55
A tired-tired fail Android3.14 Jan 2015 #24
I'm in sympathy with atheists, as my dad was an atheist, and I'm a Buddhist=no supreme being... DesertDiamond Jan 2015 #26
In recent years I have taken great inspiration from the teachings of the Buddha. dawg Jan 2015 #29
dawg, I'm so glad you get something out of Shakyamuni's teachings! :-) DesertDiamond Jan 2015 #69
As for buddhist belief in a supreme being, depends on which sect. As for harming others, buddhists ND-Dem Jan 2015 #52
Sorry you disagree, ND-Dem. Respect for life = Core principle of Buddhism. The subject of the OP DesertDiamond Jan 2015 #70
not a question of disagreeing; a question of history and fact. ND-Dem Jan 2015 #74
Leading Atheists is like, yortsed snacilbuper Jan 2015 #32
K & R AzDar Jan 2015 #44
It likely has nothing to do one with the other treestar Jan 2015 #45
1937 A Nazi Christmas yortsed snacilbuper Jan 2015 #48
Technically, Hitler was a Roman Catholic... backscatter712 Jan 2015 #56
"I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so." - Adolph Hitler, 1941 beam me up scottie Jan 2015 #58
What character flaw caused Hitchens to be such a blood-soaked war monger? cpwm17 Jan 2015 #59
so you are saying Stalin and Pol Pot were not Atheist? Or are you saying that they did not kill Douglas Carpenter Jan 2015 #63
What makes Stalin an atheist? Bradical79 Jan 2015 #72
And as for Pol Pot, also not an atheist Bradical79 Jan 2015 #73
Athiests are barred from plitical office in all countries, yortsed snacilbuper Jan 2015 #75
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Atheist Atrocities Fa...»Reply #34