Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

delrem

(9,688 posts)
27. The context is a "War on Terror" that targets "Islamic terrorists",
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 03:53 AM
Jan 2015

in case you've forgotten.

The context is one where a double-standard is dictated by the needs of war, where war propaganda rules.
*They*, the enemy, are terrorists. They are always terrorists. *We*, the "civilized west", are the good guys. We are always the good guys. No matter what we do. No matter what depth of depravity we sink to it's always "a few bad apples" who are NEVER considered to be definitive of "the civilized west" or to represent "the civilized west".

And wow, is DU ever war propaganda central, these days.
Not surprising, considering the extent of the war machinery.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

are those serious questions ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #1
A better question would be why Muslims allow images of living beings at all TexasProgresive Jan 2015 #2
You may be surprised as to the answer JonLP24 Jan 2015 #23
Your 8th century assertion isn't at all definitive JackintheGreen Jan 2015 #28
My major question to muslims is dhol82 Jan 2015 #3
Iran is primarily Shia, for whom images of Muhammad are ok. uppityperson Jan 2015 #4
There are 7 million Sunni Muslims in Iran oberliner Jan 2015 #7
i doubt they have much freedom to oppose or even question things in the country JI7 Jan 2015 #15
So they don't feel it's worth risking their lives to stand up against defamation of the prophet? oberliner Jan 2015 #29
Iran has very strict blasphemy laws JonLP24 Jan 2015 #25
Well, OK, but dhol82 Jan 2015 #33
Well, OK, but dhol82 Jan 2015 #34
That one is easy, those two lack souls... n/t Fumesucker Jan 2015 #22
Depends where you are and when you are. Igel Jan 2015 #5
Rich Muslims cwydro Jan 2015 #6
happens in Iran, there are many articles and pics on it JI7 Jan 2015 #13
Apparently little girls going to school is offensive enough to get them killed. beam me up scottie Jan 2015 #8
not in iran where the clerics required females to get an education JI7 Jan 2015 #16
Then the women in Iran are very fortunate. beam me up scottie Jan 2015 #19
in terms of education saudi arabia is ok but afterwards too many limits , Pakistan legally is ok JI7 Jan 2015 #20
Terrorism by religious extremists. beam me up scottie Jan 2015 #24
I think you'll find it is hard to understand why various religions, races, goldent Jan 2015 #9
The same people who go ape shit over abortion eat ham on Easter Major Nikon Jan 2015 #10
why do people who claim to be pro life oppose feeding poor kids ? JI7 Jan 2015 #11
These don't really feel parallel to me gollygee Jan 2015 #12
good point, i disagree with them on the images, but i get what you are saying about why JI7 Jan 2015 #18
What about images of pork? benz380 Jan 2015 #14
Which doctrine is most at odds with Islam JonLP24 Jan 2015 #17
Muhammad is more important to Muslims than a pig. kwassa Jan 2015 #21
it is all sheer nuttiness; it is just a matter of degree Skittles Jan 2015 #26
The context is a "War on Terror" that targets "Islamic terrorists", delrem Jan 2015 #27
trying to make sence out of abstracts is futile . olddots Jan 2015 #30
Hypocrisy in religion? Say it ain't so! Jake Stern Jan 2015 #31
Theres a difference treestar Jan 2015 #32
Religion is comprised of hypocrisy and Islam makes a run for first prize in that race. Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is publishing an imag...»Reply #27