General Discussion

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)

50. easy

Reply to Fred Sanders (Reply #48)

Sun Jan 18, 2015, 04:33 PM

Jan 2015

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6102702

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

247 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lawmakers Ban Open Carry In Washington State Capitol After Gun Nuts Storm Building [View all] Fred Sanders Jan 2015 OP

Cold, dead, brains. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #1

+10,000,000 eom MohRokTah Jan 2015 #3

+1 an entire shit load. Enthusiast Jan 2015 #157

What game are they hunting in Washington DC? Or where did they see a sign of a target range? Thinkingabout Jan 2015 #2

Washington State, GGJohn Jan 2015 #4

That is next up for the idiots. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #7

Washington State is split down the middle between Left Coast and Mountain West starroute Jan 2015 #59

It does indeed. The numerous millitary bases in western washington make for some additional Veilex Jan 2015 #140

This is the capital of the State of Washington, Olympia. nt NutmegYankee Jan 2015 #5

Further damage to the gun militancy movement, courtesy of Open Carry goons. Paladin Jan 2015 #6

I would award them a James Brady gold star for helping with gun control. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #8

And how 'bout a Darwin Award? calimary Jan 2015 #12

Darwin and guns also do not mix well with the Christian warriors in gas masks. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #30

They didn't give a damn.. butterfly77 Jan 2015 #36

Who does not hate hypocrisy and double standards? And they are breaking out all over in the news. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #53

More to come... butterfly77 Jan 2015 #55

+1,000 malaise Jan 2015 #221

Maybe it's a well-concealed cry for help? No pun intended Demeter Jan 2015 #9

Gun Nuts: You Can Open Carry.....But Only If You Aren't Muslim......so, Christians only? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #11

Yet another instance of Open Carry being a hallmark of white privilege. (nt) Paladin Jan 2015 #16

I just noticed the other person on the right has a bayonet mounted on their rifle. nt benz380 Jan 2015 #23

Oh my God, did not see that....hope the lawmakers also installed panic buttons. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #25

Looks like an old WW1 style bolt action rifle. eom GGJohn Jan 2015 #28

Keep digging..... Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #34

What the fuck are babbling on about now? GGJohn Jan 2015 #41

I believe he is saying the gun nuts should keep digging--in reference to the adage that tblue37 Jan 2015 #110

I don't think so. GGJohn Jan 2015 #115

FS is pro gun control (see post #21 below), so I do think his intention is tblue37 Jan 2015 #122

no, sorry to disagree Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #123

Pro-gun ban, you mean. beevul Jan 2015 #227

sounds like a banner to me Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #231

I know it. beevul Jan 2015 #234

Romney supporter, no doubt. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2015 #196

John Stokes needs to quit stealing my ideas: friendly_iconoclast Jan 2015 #239

Wonder why guy in lower right is wearing a gas mask? nt benz380 Jan 2015 #10

Too chickenshit to show his face? calimary Jan 2015 #13

Talking to the empty chair beside him pretending it is Obama? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #15

Believe it or not, some kind of fucking body armor. Maybe a gun nut could clear that up? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #14

That's a gas mask, GGJohn Jan 2015 #18

Thank you. On cue. I stand corrected. Gas mask in the legislature it is. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #19

This message was self-deleted by its author GGJohn Jan 2015 #20

Ah, my fan club from the Gungeon arrives..careful there. Handling words without training is as Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #22

there you go with the insults again Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #45

Another fan. Link? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #48

easy Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #50

and you just hit the nail on the head azureblue Jan 2015 #61

So does the Democratic party and the president hack89 Jan 2015 #78

... Major Nikon Jan 2015 #79

Those are Airsoft players, shooting plastic BB's at each other in the woods NickB79 Jan 2015 #89

Good catch!!!! GGJohn Jan 2015 #94

not a chance Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #207

Be still my heart! Gag! Divernan Jan 2015 #139

That is not a real gun. nt hack89 Jan 2015 #236

that is basic english such as samsingh Jan 2015 #206

+10000 the Gun Humpers have arrived Katashi_itto Jan 2015 #152

Probably because his buddies aren't too fond of bathing n/t n2doc Jan 2015 #240

How is the guy in the first photo not guilty of brandishing? Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2015 #17

A gun nut will tell to you all the intricate details of how The Precious is very safe. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #21

No, they won't. GGJohn Jan 2015 #24

So he is guilty of brandishing a weapon....nice to see you agree and tell us, sir. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #27

Not what I said, GGJohn Jan 2015 #33

What do you call that position? With the finger in the trigger guard ready to go. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2015 #44

Here in AZ, that would be considered brandishing, GGJohn Jan 2015 #51

Wiki says in WA aiming a gun at another person is brandishing unless done in self-defense. nt benz380 Jan 2015 #56

So you have to actually aim it at someone to be considered brandishing? GGJohn Jan 2015 #60

"That's a pretty loose definition of brandishing." - not really. Veilex Jan 2015 #141

Don't fall for it. He's trying to derail the discussion by controlling the vocabulary. Paladin Jan 2015 #158

And you would know, your side does it all the time. eom. GGJohn Jan 2015 #163

The nice thing about english, is that vocabulary is largly immutable... Veilex Jan 2015 #242

Right!!! I love how the gun-nutters make up terms to sound all smart and shit mentalslavery Jan 2015 #247

Do not let the gunners get you off track, the topic is the crazies with guns intimidating democracy Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #161

Coming from you? GGJohn Jan 2015 #168

What does the law say? hack89 Jan 2015 #62

It doesn't say anything; you have to read it. Nuuk nyuk. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2015 #71

classic example of heaven05 Jan 2015 #26

yow: that looks like stuff from Kiev MisterP Jan 2015 #29

I saw those pictures also...the purpose is not "rights", the purpose is political intimidation. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #31

It would have been fitting if,,,,,,, Cryptoad Jan 2015 #32

They would have been locked up or worse. nt benz380 Jan 2015 #35

Thats what Im talking about,,,,,,,, nt Cryptoad Jan 2015 #46

Will this just deepen their psychosis? Preppers are a strange group. Rex Jan 2015 #37

Open carry says, "Don't mess with me 'cause I'm armed and tough" mindwalker_i Jan 2015 #38

And, look, I brought my kid with me so he can see democracy in action....from the barrel of a gun? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #40

They seem to think that... butterfly77 Jan 2015 #39

An excellent example in as to why gun control is needed. Dawson Leery Jan 2015 #42

"Ye shall know them by their deeds". Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #43

And the WA. State lawmakers took care of that problem. eom GGJohn Jan 2015 #47

I am not sure I agee it is taken care of. genxlib Jan 2015 #67

Open carry isn't really the problem, GGJohn Jan 2015 #70

How did you tell who is the criminal and who is the good old boy? When they take aim? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #73

Ummmm, the criminal would be the one committing crimes. GGJohn Jan 2015 #74

Follow these simple and helpful hints! Electric Monk Jan 2015 #83

Tell that to the mother who's 2 year old shot her dead Politicalboi Jan 2015 #84

Those are relatively rare occasions. GGJohn Jan 2015 #85

Well, they become a criminal after they shoot or intimidate soneone. Hoyt Jan 2015 #91

Or rob someone. N/T beevul Jan 2015 #228

So Arizona hasn't got any Liberty Speakers, Sovereign Citizens, "Creativity" types? countryjake Jan 2015 #134

I wouldn't know, I don't hang around with those kind of people. eom GGJohn Jan 2015 #153

Do they hang around you, though? Do you like their thinking? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #162

Hey genius, GGJohn Jan 2015 #165

Non-responsive, but clear as a bell. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #166

Why don't you tell us just what the fuck you're babbling on about again? eom GGJohn Jan 2015 #167

Post Survives... ProdigalJunkMail Jan 2015 #176

Thanks for the results. GGJohn Jan 2015 #177

he answered your question Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #170

Ya know, you would think Fred would be tired by now of having GGJohn Jan 2015 #172

more like tired from running away from Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #189

This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Jan 2015 #49

But he is surrounded by good white folks brandishing the protective armor of second amendment remedies? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #52

This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Jan 2015 #66

Probably scared crazy by the crazies waving guns around, just a wild guess. The lawmakers were. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #68

Actually that is a great idea! ncjustice80 Jan 2015 #160

This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Jan 2015 #210

I wasnt joking either. ncjustice80 Jan 2015 #241

Yay guns!!!! Initech Jan 2015 #54

Starting? jmowreader Jan 2015 #86

These damn fools do this and then wonder why some want more legislation to control guns as RKP5637 Jan 2015 #57

The last photo should be "Exhibit 'A' in any gun control debate. It's a keeper. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #63

Morons. n/t Jefferson23 Jan 2015 #58

The irony is that the government collects records of their phone calls and computer searches JDPriestly Jan 2015 #64

Apparently because there is a clause in the constitution that makes guns immune from laws? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #65

So I guess that the more than 20,000 Federal/State/Local firearm laws GGJohn Jan 2015 #75

Immune from laws. Is free speech immune from laws? JDPriestly Jan 2015 #77

wankers nothing but wankers olddots Jan 2015 #69

I think it is just the power rush, sexuality does not have to enter the equation, power in their Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #72

This is masturbating in public. ZX86 Jan 2015 #130

It only takes a few gun nuts to ruin it for all the rest of the gun nuts Major Nikon Jan 2015 #76

The only explanation? bleedinglib Jan 2015 #80

I see white people storming a government building with military assault weapons and workinclasszero Jan 2015 #81

I get your drift, GGJohn Jan 2015 #82

They still kill efficiently; otherwise, gun fanciers would have no interest in acquiring them. Hoyt Jan 2015 #92

Any firearm can kill efficiently, especially in the hands of someone GGJohn Jan 2015 #93

How many so-called Assault Rifles did you brag about owning? Hoyt Jan 2015 #98

I didn't because I don't own any Assault Rifles. eom GGJohn Jan 2015 #100

No ARs or other semi-autos? Hoyt Jan 2015 #108

Those aren't Assault Rifles. GGJohn Jan 2015 #116

you would think Hoyt would know better by now Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #124

Nope. But they called an "assault rifle." In fact, they are marketed as that to you guys. Hoyt Jan 2015 #178

So, Hoyt, what does the AR stand for? eom. GGJohn Jan 2015 #179

Gun nomenclature doesn't interest me, but it stands for Armalite. Fact is, assault rifles are Hoyt Jan 2015 #180

Took you a while to go look it up didn't it? GGJohn Jan 2015 #182

Semi-autos can kill about as many folks as auto -- Sandy Hook, Auoro, etc. Hoyt Jan 2015 #184

I actually like bolt action and semi-auto Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #191

Yeah, the AR platform is a necessity for duck -- or any other type of -- hunting. Hoyt Jan 2015 #194

so just how many times do I have to tell you Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #195

That's nice. You still promote guns here, and use a gun related reference in your user name. Hoyt Jan 2015 #198

not promoting, just saying they have uses Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #202

So obvious. So revealing of the gunner mentality. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #187

An "assault rifle" is whatever the NY Times says it is, on any given day. Paladin Jan 2015 #190

A "non-assault" semi-auto still kills real good, that is so undeniable. Sandy Hook is the evidence. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #192

so you admit there is no Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #193

Here's what I'll admit: Paladin Jan 2015 #197

"It's chicken-shit behavior on your part" Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #205

Exactly, the gun nomenclature game they use is just a ruse. Hoyt Jan 2015 #208

That does not bother me that much Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #211

Well, even colt 1911s are marketed as Automatics. Semi-autos are capable of firing rapidly. Hoyt Jan 2015 #213

yep, some early semi-auto pistols were (NSFW pictures) Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #216

^^^^^^^^GUN PORN warning^^^^^^^^^ Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #217

I added a disclaimer Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #218

Pull the trigger, what is there to train on, a 2 year old can do it! Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #219

so Hoyt posted gun porn too? Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #220

I didn't post it for gunners' prurient interests. Hoyt Jan 2015 #223

I did not either, knowledge is power Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #224

amazing my question to Fred goes unanswered Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #225

A two year in a shopping cart can kill an adult, they are all efficient in killing, it is what they do. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #95

Who cares? Bullet-dispensers DO NOT belong in our capitol building! countryjake Jan 2015 #99

Exactly. Parsing the firepower of each individual firearm in the gallery is pathetically deflective. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #106

Not only deflecting, I'd like to see him try telling the dope who had that old AR-10 countryjake Jan 2015 #132

Angry children, too immature to understand their sad lives are their fault, not the gubermint. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #133

Slap the dumb mofos in jail. OldRedneck Jan 2015 #87

Slap them in jail for what? GGJohn Jan 2015 #88

Creating a disturbance, impeding government, terrorism, public nuisance, etc. Hoyt Jan 2015 #109

Intimidation, public mischief, criminal negligence, endangering a child, general foolishness? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #113

Apparently the authorities disagree with you. GGJohn Jan 2015 #118

Yeah, they were cool with the racist Bundy Ranch Militia. IIRC, you were too. Hoyt Jan 2015 #136

I was cool with the racist Bundy Ranch Militia? GGJohn Jan 2015 #154

Lol read the reply again. ncjustice80 Jan 2015 #159

I don't need to re-read it, GGJohn Jan 2015 #169

maybe they need to reread that insult Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #171

Laws aren't quite as flexible or maleable as group SOPs are. N/T beevul Jan 2015 #229

Maybe they ought to be when we allow terrorist gun nuts like that to intimidate people. Hoyt Jan 2015 #230

Ok. Since you admitted you robbbed people in the past, lets take you to jail first. N/T beevul Jan 2015 #232

I hope you are consistant Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #233

Found that link yet Mr. Hoyt? GGJohn Jan 2015 #238

agreed. they have a right to be there with all their guns. samsingh Jan 2015 #204

Had. Past tense, they no longer are allowed, which is a good thing IMO. eom GGJohn Jan 2015 #237

this is an attack on my 2A rights samsingh Jan 2015 #243

No, not really. GGJohn Jan 2015 #244

it's the tip of the iceburg. if we give in here samsingh Jan 2015 #245

Seems fair NickB79 Jan 2015 #90

See they can protect themselves malaise Jan 2015 #96

Looks like they all lead lonely, empty lives...pity that poor child they placed right in the middle. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #97

What disturbs me is why they are more afraid of what the 'skin color' folks malaise Jan 2015 #142

Damn them! They're infringing on our right to keep and bear backpacks! progressoid Jan 2015 #101

Now hold on a second. When it comes to their safety they ban guns but don't give rhett o rick Jan 2015 #102

Gee, ya think? Chemisse Jan 2015 #103

The back pack could be concealing a gun? Take it out and brandish it though, good to go? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #107

So prior to this incident umbrellas were banned but guns were cool BeyondGeography Jan 2015 #104

Well sure SwankyXomb Jan 2015 #125

Maybe they are prohibited because they are not harmless inanimate objects? Like a gun. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #126

That's an interesting thought: AleksS Jan 2015 #212

Can we get every idiotic gun nut in one massive circle and then, Arugula Latte Jan 2015 #105

How come gunners have no problem registering their kids with the government, but not their killing Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #111

Really, pop a bag or something and watch em duck. Hoyt Jan 2015 #112

They would need an "American Diaper". My next film project about gunners in America. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #114

This message was self-deleted by its author GGJohn Jan 2015 #120

LOL. GGJohn Jan 2015 #121

Stupid. Yeah, Protest "extended background checks" .. because that might actually Cha Jan 2015 #117

A scene from my soon to be released sequel to American Sniper...... Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #119

We should support open carry demonstrations Matrosov Jan 2015 #127

No, we should not. We should continue to mock them and their lawmaker enablers. No support. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #129

No, they're white. It won't work. jeff47 Jan 2015 #200

"Black Panther Open Carry March" will have them scrambling for gun control faster than you can say Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #201

If these half wits secondvariety Jan 2015 #128

So that state's lawmakers will protect themselves but no one else? nt valerief Jan 2015 #131

Fucking gun humpers! gopiscrap Jan 2015 #135

The guy in that picture looks like a Nazi. I can't wrap my mind around nuts with guns in the ND-Dem Jan 2015 #137

The OC people are starting to go nuts in Texas(!) as well Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2015 #138

Gun nuts are being used as pawns by those in power exactly as religious nuts are used. Useful Idiots. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #144

Suppose an equal number of black gun owners storm Mississippi's capital Orrex Jan 2015 #143

I would like a minority gun nut group to do the same on the same day the white gun nut group goes..... Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #145

Months ago my local "gun shop" had some sort of "bring out yer guns" rally. Orrex Jan 2015 #147

White privilege is made more powerful when white folks have black guns. Like the police. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #148

What, were they high? underpants Jan 2015 #146

Fox News and hate radio and TV IS a drug. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #149

Fred Sanders Diclotican Jan 2015 #150

Even as gun laws are the loosest they have been, ever, it is still the position of the gun nuts Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #151

Fred I love you trumad Jan 2015 #155

I get under their skin and I keep burrowing..I am not trying to change their gun obsessed minds, I Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #156

I have my own little gang of small penis MRA types, trumad Jan 2015 #173

They seem unaware of how childishly shrill they are, look at how they defend the gunners, yet Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #181

LOL. This gets funnier with every post. GGJohn Jan 2015 #183

Yes, the gunner responses do get funny. Hoyt Jan 2015 #185

At least we have a sense of humor, unlike the anti's. eom. GGJohn Jan 2015 #186

and they are the same ones Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #246

LOL!!! You? Get under our skin? GGJohn Jan 2015 #175

What a difference in governance!! lark Jan 2015 #164

In WI-they are allowed in Capitol Building but not in lawmaker offices...... riversedge Jan 2015 #188

Now that cannabis is.... CanSocDem Jan 2015 #174

This started when gun nuts stormed Oregon's capitol building 2 years ago... cascadiance Jan 2015 #199

this is the one place where guns should be allowed in all forms samsingh Jan 2015 #203

Good guy???? mfr4 Jan 2015 #209

................... Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #214

When is a gun owner -not- a gun nut? Shamash Jan 2015 #215

I live in Georgia which has one of the most liberal carry policies in the nation..... RationalMan Jan 2015 #222

Oklahoma is no carry in government Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #226

They're so fucking stupid! Gunners and tea-billies are really something. Ed Suspicious Jan 2015 #235