Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(7,596 posts)

15. "Charlie" is the name of the magazine.

Sun Jan 18, 2015, 05:47 PM

Jan 2015

There is no "Charlie" the person.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wouldn't the choice of dioing that be a case of free speech? TexasProgresive Jan 2015 #1

yep... free speech in the form of cowardice n/t ProdigalJunkMail Jan 2015 #6

Was CH handing out copyright licenses? jberryhill Jan 2015 #8

you go right ahead and believe that is why they did it... ProdigalJunkMail Jan 2015 #9

Did I say that? jberryhill Jan 2015 #13

That is not correct. Ms. Toad Jan 2015 #19

Sorry, but one sees this all the time. PSPS Jan 2015 #21

Seeing it all the time, Ms. Toad Jan 2015 #22

Yes, but obviously that's only a defence of legalising it, not doing it. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2015 #10

Well here it is unblurred TexasProgresive Jan 2015 #11

No. The government isn't stopping the media from publishing those cartoons. Comrade Grumpy Jan 2015 #2

Indeed he is, and with good cause. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2015 #12

"Charlie" is the name of the magazine. BlueStater Jan 2015 #15

The USA Media Industrial Complex Pooka Fey Jan 2015 #5

This is the same American media that includes Bill O'Reilly JonLP24 Jan 2015 #17

Fuck him Egnever Jan 2015 #18

Hence my response that I am not Charlie Hebdo. n/t Ms. Toad Jan 2015 #20