Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

PSPS

(15,376 posts)

21. Sorry, but one sees this all the time.

Reply to Ms. Toad (Reply #19)

Sun Jan 18, 2015, 10:29 PM

Jan 2015

I don't know about your "clients," but the rule of thumb at daily newspapers is that if it is newsworthy, related to the story, is attributed, and otherwise meets the editorial discretion of the publisher, it's good to go.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New �Charlie Hebdo� editor scolds US media: When you blur our cover, �you blur out democracy� [View all] kpete Jan 2015 OP

Wouldn't the choice of dioing that be a case of free speech? TexasProgresive Jan 2015 #1

yep... free speech in the form of cowardice n/t ProdigalJunkMail Jan 2015 #6

Was CH handing out copyright licenses? jberryhill Jan 2015 #8

you go right ahead and believe that is why they did it... ProdigalJunkMail Jan 2015 #9

Did I say that? jberryhill Jan 2015 #13

With attribution, a news article can publish any image without a release (17 US Code � 107) PSPS Jan 2015 #16

That is not correct. Ms. Toad Jan 2015 #19

Sorry, but one sees this all the time. PSPS Jan 2015 #21

Seeing it all the time, Ms. Toad Jan 2015 #22

Yes, but obviously that's only a defence of legalising it, not doing it. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2015 #10

Well here it is unblurred TexasProgresive Jan 2015 #11

No. The government isn't stopping the media from publishing those cartoons. Comrade Grumpy Jan 2015 #2

charlie's mad cause we wont join him in his rudeness to the rest of the religious world belzabubba333 Jan 2015 #3

Indeed he is, and with good cause. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2015 #12

"Charlie" is the name of the magazine. BlueStater Jan 2015 #15

The media decided to dump on democracy, secularism, freedom of religon, and insult the citizenship. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2015 #4

The USA Media Industrial Complex Pooka Fey Jan 2015 #5

I wouldn't have Charlie Hebdo in my home because I think it's crude and stupid. Brigid Jan 2015 #7

It's left wing, pro equality and pro gay. Their original slogan was 'Stupid and Nasty' which was Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #14

This is the same American media that includes Bill O'Reilly JonLP24 Jan 2015 #17

Fuck him Egnever Jan 2015 #18

Hence my response that I am not Charlie Hebdo. n/t Ms. Toad Jan 2015 #20