Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I support Hillary because she can bring change to our country [View all]Autumn
(48,964 posts)5. What do you think she will change? I see income inequality as the number 1 threat
to our country. What do YOU think Hillary will do to change that? Convince me to vote for her.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
277 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yep, Wall Street LOVE$ her. Citigroup: "I think Hillary would be a great president."
RiverLover
Jan 2015
#13
Actually, that poll just said 85% wanted to see her run...not that they "loved her". n/t.
Ken Burch
Jan 2015
#166
What do you think she will change? I see income inequality as the number 1 threat
Autumn
Jan 2015
#5
Be careful what you ask for. What kind of changes? Bad ones? Like ending Glass Steagall? NAFTA?
TheNutcracker
Jan 2015
#6
I think she will do just fine if elected and will be more to the left then some here think.
hrmjustin
Jan 2015
#7
Also according to 2007 polls. According to 2011 polls, even 2012, Obama could not beat
merrily
Jan 2015
#56
Hillary is a winner? She had a 30 point lead in 2008 and blew it. Just like Martha Coakley.*
merrily
Jan 2015
#64
No, you are not. But my comment about your going full circle had nothing to do with
merrily
Jan 2015
#80
The popular vote is irrelevant in the Presidential, both the primary and the general. No partial
merrily
Jan 2015
#121
Fine with me. That doesn't mean I can't post to point out fallacies in your posts, though.
merrily
Jan 2015
#125
I do heartily applaud your keeping your sense of humor after your claim was refuted so soundly.
merrily
Jan 2015
#130
Refuted i think not. All you are interested in doing is trashing Hillary and I want no part of it.
hrmjustin
Jan 2015
#131
Then you don't know when you've been refuted or know the difference between facts and trashing.
merrily
Jan 2015
#132
Did no such thing. I specifically said I didn't know who was or was not a paid poster.
merrily
Jan 2015
#202
Never before spring 2008, when Hillary was not doing as well in the primaries as she should have,
karynnj
Jan 2015
#234
She started with a lead of about 15 points and then built it up. At its height it was averaging 25
StevieM
Jan 2015
#149
That was one poll. Her average lead, at its height, was more like 25 points. And I don't think she
StevieM
Jan 2015
#168
Is blowing a lead of 25, average, really very different from blowing a lead that got as high as 30?
merrily
Jan 2015
#169
To add to your comments, which I agree with, she had the Shaheen machine behind her
karynnj
Jan 2015
#236
Like 2008? No, it isn't clear, per all the posts about that on this thread from last night.
merrily
Jan 2015
#217
If she silently backed all of Bill's right-wing shit then, she can't be progressive now. n/t.
Ken Burch
Jan 2015
#160
She'll say whatever she thinks she needs to say to get elected but her latest campaign rhetoric,
merrily
Jan 2015
#175
She was first lady. The first lady does not oppose their husbands policies publicly.
hrmjustin
Jan 2015
#199
She was not First Lady after 2000. If she still can't oppose his policies publicly,
merrily
Jan 2015
#206
One likely change under HRC is the US will go boots in first into the Middle East.
leveymg
Jan 2015
#9
Then, at least, run on that - "Not as bad as Jeb" - and don't insult us with the hopey changey
djean111
Jan 2015
#26
You are asking that question as if it is a lock that Jeb or Hillary will be my only choices.
djean111
Jan 2015
#35
Are you saying that the TARP legislation was re-written after Obama took office?
merrily
Jan 2015
#164
Since the Treasury falls under the Executive Branch, they have flexibility how to oversee it.
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#247
"With a Democratic Congress they were able to change how TARP was used." Again, are you saying that
merrily
Jan 2015
#248
Thanks. I am curious, so, as I said, I will look into it more. As far as how much the Treasury made
merrily
Jan 2015
#252
Wikipedia has a detailed timeline (I can't vouch for its accuracy) so you might want to start there.
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#258
Yes, of course I know about and remember Dodd Frank, but that is not numerous bills.
merrily
Jan 2015
#262
Okay. Now it feels as if you're nitpicking. I've given you links to a couple of sites
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#266
Sorry you feel that way. I am not dismissing, just saying I am not ready to look into it today and
merrily
Jan 2015
#267
Never claimed she was. But she IS the strongest, according to all the polls.
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#257
At this point, the polls are telling a-political American voters a great deal.
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#264
+100. it's all of a piece anyway: each lousy prez sets up the ground for the next one to
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#155
Yes, that is exactly what those of us to the left of Corporate Hillary want -- Jeb
LondonReign2
Jan 2015
#27
"More of the same" would depend on what Congress we help get her in 2016 should she win the nom.
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#34
And a Dem President is the head of the Dem Party. The meme that the head of the Party has no sway
merrily
Jan 2015
#181
Why take a loyalty oath before she even announces, when she is not your favorite?
merrily
Jan 2015
#180
In every single head-to-head polls, SoS Clinton wins from all potetial candidates, both Republican
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#244
Yes. That's why I wrote that polls are snapshots in time. But we can't deny that each and every poll
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#259
Yes, you can rightly deny all polls this far out, or at least not conclude they must be right or
merrily
Jan 2015
#261
Any Democrat should be able to beat Mitt and Jeb, if he or she really wants to.
merrily
Jan 2015
#182
Only if we keep acting as though Hillary is the only Dem out of maybe 75 million.
merrily
Jan 2015
#59
Bullshit. My naming names or not is irrelevant to whether Democrats who can win exist and
merrily
Jan 2015
#84
Say whatever you like it only adds character to some, it does not change me in
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#88
No, but that's never stopped you before and I don't expect it to stop you now or in the future.
merrily
Jan 2015
#96
Yes, telling you you're wrong proves you're right. Just as "good" as your "logic" upthread.
merrily
Jan 2015
#104
says the person who used a right wing website to support her social security misstatements
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#157
To be perfectly fair, he or she also used the guests on the Judge Judy show to support his fact free
merrily
Jan 2015
#178
As much as I admire and would love Senator Warren as president, she will lose.
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#143
In your opinion, Warren will lose. In my opinon, Hillary will lose. Let's hope someone else runs.
merrily
Jan 2015
#183
Well, I've been wrong plenty of times, so who knows? Maybe you'll get it right again.
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#241
It wasn't intended to be what you think but I'm sure you didn't struggle to take it that way.
L0oniX
Jan 2015
#89
I know you are for Hillary ...and you know I am not ...which has nothing to do with...
L0oniX
Jan 2015
#102
Do you really not understand the sexism in the comment about Hillary's grandchildren?
pnwmom
Jan 2015
#119
Don't put words in my post. If you don't want to reply to what I actually posted,
merrily
Jan 2015
#123
I think we know what this is about and it's not sexism. It's Hillary supporters using sexism...
L0oniX
Jan 2015
#249
I'm still neutral, as I was the last time when I liked all three main candidates.
pnwmom
Jan 2015
#144
Forget her words. I am sure she will adapt them to the current populist mood, just as Mitt has.
merrily
Jan 2015
#116
yeah, americans hate populism. hate hate hate. they like shit wages, no time off, and sending
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#159
Well, no Dem is going to do that. Them sleeping dogs gonna continue to be left to lie.
merrily
Jan 2015
#138
The changes she and her husband and other DINOS brought with H-1B expansion brought BAD change...
cascadiance
Jan 2015
#36
If she employs the accent highly selectively in public, you can call it a put on accent, even if her
merrily
Jan 2015
#179
I haven't lived in the South for over 30 years. I can be with my family members down there for
Autumn
Jan 2015
#229
Change like the six years she was on Walmart's Board of Directors, and failed
closeupready
Jan 2015
#38
Don't worry, when Warren supports Clinton she'll join the bunch under the bus.
freshwest
Jan 2015
#106
Yep you are probably right, it is funny when sone refer to 1985, was this during the years
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#115
Warren is very good in her field of expertise, I just don't know where she will go when action just
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#145
Reagan? Hillary and Obama both put him on their respective list of 10 Best US Presidents ever. 1985
merrily
Jan 2015
#186
but it should be Hillary Clinton to become the catalyst of change in our country.
DonCoquixote
Jan 2015
#103
Well, the OP apparently lost in interest in the thread. That doesn't mean the replies are all
merrily
Jan 2015
#139
She will do a fine job as President of the US, she has lots of experience in dealing with goverments
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#154
There is no way that eight years of centrist Gore would have led to an actually progressive Obama
Ken Burch
Jan 2015
#271
I'll reluctantly support Clinton if she is the nominee but I don't expect
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2015
#192
I would vote for Hillary in the general, but I don't see her as an agent of change.
Vinca
Jan 2015
#200
So you have no response at all as to how Hillary can bring change to our country?
Autumn
Jan 2015
#239
Who would she have in her cabinet, especially in Finance and Defense? Would she remove all
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#240
Hillary has cosponsored several bills to increase the minimum wage and finally got it up to
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#256