Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 01:30 PM Jan 2015

So, you don't think we iive in a full-blown police state? Think again. [View all]

New police radars can 'see' inside homes
USA Today * Brad Heath * Jan. 19, 2015

At least 50 U.S. law enforcement agencies quietly deployed radars that let them effectively see inside homes, with little notice to the courts or the public.


WASHINGTON — At least 50 U.S. law enforcement agencies have secretly equipped their officers with radar devices that allow them to effectively peer through the walls of houses to see whether anyone is inside, a practice raising new concerns about the extent of government surveillance.

Those agencies, including the FBI and the U.S. Marshals Service, began deploying the radar systems more than two years ago with little notice to the courts and no public disclosure of when or how they would be used. The technology raises legal and privacy issues because the U.S. Supreme Court has said officers generally cannot use high-tech sensors to tell them about the inside of a person's house without first obtaining a search warrant.

The radars work like finely tuned motion detectors, using radio waves to zero in on movements as slight as human breathing from a distance of more than 50 feet. They can detect whether anyone is inside of a house, where they are and whether they are moving.

Current and former federal officials say the information is critical for keeping officers safe if they need to storm buildings or rescue hostages. But privacy advocates and judges have nonetheless expressed concern about the circumstances in which law enforcement agencies may be using the radars — and the fact that they have so far done so without public scrutiny.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/01/19/police-radar-see-through-walls/22007615/
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stick a fork in us. tblue Jan 2015 #1
it appears that technology is the boiling pot of water. grasswire Jan 2015 #2
Yes, it seems that way! We have people even here who don't think we need due process sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #3
It's rather amazing to watch them destroy their own lede in two adjacent sentences. jeff47 Jan 2015 #4
But how do we know they are getting warrants? randome Jan 2015 #10
Because they have to in order to use anything that comes from the search. jeff47 Jan 2015 #21
it says no such thing.. frylock Jan 2015 #15
They're using warrants or they can't use anything that comes from the search. jeff47 Jan 2015 #20
It usually is a good practice to click on the link... Luminous Animal Jan 2015 #28
Except that still isn't the case. jeff47 Jan 2015 #29
I have absoluely no problems with this technology, so long as use is limited and monitored. MohRokTah Jan 2015 #5
It would be easy to defeat such a system. nilesobek Jan 2015 #6
Yeah, an obvious option for most everyone. JackRiddler Jan 2015 #22
Noted. nilesobek Jan 2015 #24
Kyllo v. United States Scuba Jan 2015 #7
Nice find. nt 99th_Monkey Jan 2015 #25
Does anyone remember this type of audio device in the movie ET? KauaiK Jan 2015 #8
Jimmy McNulty: Ykcutnek Jan 2015 #9
Some cops are going to be getting off using this to spy on people in their homes at night dissentient Jan 2015 #11
Time to consider moving to..... RoverSuswade Jan 2015 #12
Oh, really? You think it's just a coincidence that the Martian rover is still working? randome Jan 2015 #13
Oops. I forgot about that. RoverSuswade Jan 2015 #27
I predict a big spike in the sale of lead sheeting for installation in the home. Orrex Jan 2015 #14
Is this the same technology used in the Boston bomber case ? Spooky69 Jan 2015 #16
C'mon, 99! Everybody knows for this to be a Police State requires summary execution of citizens. Octafish Jan 2015 #17
Why am I reminded of Futurama just now? Initech Jan 2015 #18
Overactive surveillance isn't sufficient to make a police state mythology Jan 2015 #19
Yay! Still miles away! JackRiddler Jan 2015 #23
Last time I pointed out we lived in a "de facto" police state Kelvin Mace Jan 2015 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, you don't think we ii...