Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,848 posts)

32. If you don't like this site. Feel free to get the fuck out. nt

Reply to Sopkoviak (Reply #17)

Thu Jan 22, 2015, 12:39 AM

Jan 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How does screwing with and taxing the 529 education plans I have set up for the grandkids [View all] Sopkoviak Jan 2015 OP

Makes no sense to me either LondonReign2 Jan 2015 #1

They aren't. They are targeting the middle class for an expanded tax credit CreekDog Jan 2015 #5

Like all capital gains, it mostly goes to the top 10% or so Recursion Jan 2015 #9

At this point it really does not impact me exboyfil Jan 2015 #2

My children have been the beneficiaries of 529 plans set up SheilaT Jan 2015 #28

It's a ann--- Jan 2015 #3

because they are reducing that tax incentive in order to expand another that helps lower incomes CreekDog Jan 2015 #4

B as in B, S as in S. Sopkoviak Jan 2015 #10

I do since you don't seem to understand the statement you're calling BS CreekDog Jan 2015 #11

could you explain? cause i don't get it either. ND-Dem Jan 2015 #34

I'm against any taxation of any funds invested for the purpose of post-secondary education Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2015 #35

Because most people who use them make six figures Recursion Jan 2015 #6

Post removed Post removed Jan 2015 #12

Yea, I think this may not be the site or the party for you, Sop. LiberalAndProud Jan 2015 #16

The site maybe. But the party? Sopkoviak Jan 2015 #17

McCarthy ... as in Joseph? LiberalAndProud Jan 2015 #18

If you don't know who Eugene McCarthy was Sopkoviak Jan 2015 #19

Okay, then. LiberalAndProud Jan 2015 #22

I'm sure the poster knows who he was. They were just making fun of your troll ass. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Jan 2015 #33

Sop may have voted for Eugene McCarthy. LiberalAndProud Jan 2015 #37

This little gem here makes him sound more like a David Duke voter: Guy Whitey Corngood Jan 2015 #38

If you don't like this site. Feel free to get the fuck out. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Jan 2015 #32

You are correct, and I have a problem with taxing "gains" that are really just due to inflation too! cpamomfromtexas Jan 2015 #20

There it is kcr Jan 2015 #23

6 figures is nothing? tammywammy Jan 2015 #24

I'd love to have some of that nothing! MADem Jan 2015 #27

And this is why I won't invest in Roth's joeglow3 Jan 2015 #21

All capital gains should be taxed, period, in my opinion Recursion Jan 2015 #36

I am not say you are wrong. joeglow3 Jan 2015 #39

It would be replaced with expanded higher ed tax credits. subterranean Jan 2015 #7

There's an article saying just what you said: CreekDog Jan 2015 #13

Thanks for the links. n/t subterranean Jan 2015 #14

The people who need help have nothing left of their check, after bills, Ykcutnek Jan 2015 #8

It's like when they limited flex spending accounts to 2500 to help pay for ACA aikoaiko Jan 2015 #15

No, you see...this is about "the future!" The present and past can go screw themselves... davidn3600 Jan 2015 #25

I'd sooner get it right now than not at all. LiberalAndProud Jan 2015 #29

What you got from the plan is not from reading the plan CreekDog Jan 2015 #31

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2015 #26

I think I understand LynnTTT Jan 2015 #30