Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I think that there is a high probability that Tom Brady will not be playing in the Super Bowl [View all]Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)58. I'll take the other side of that bet
The NFL is not going to run a Super Bowl with the Patriots running their backup QB, if it can be helped. Too much money is on the line, and money trumps all - especially integrity. It's true American values on display - the temporary huff will subside, the big game will be played, people will move on and forget about it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think that there is a high probability that Tom Brady will not be playing in the Super Bowl [View all]
cleanhippie
Jan 2015
OP
You may be right, but football fans are even more outraged over this than the Rice scandal.
cleanhippie
Jan 2015
#4
The only fans outraged are those who hate them? Hmm, I dont hate any football team but I am pretty
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#78
there are some NFL Hall of Famers and former champions that are none too pleased
frylock
Jan 2015
#121
What he knew or didn't know or should have known doesn't add up to a hill of beans
Major Nikon
Jan 2015
#86
Of course he knew. If D'Qwell Jackson of the Colts could tell, in a single interception that the
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#49
Jackson said last night that this was not true. He said that he could NOT tell. n/t
MANative
Jan 2015
#57
I think you're quoting "facts" that are not in evidence. The NFL has said NOTHING.
MANative
Jan 2015
#11
the refs wouldn't need to go to such lengths to effect the outcome of a game ffs..
frylock
Jan 2015
#139
You don't see cheating as being on the same level as game-fixing and bounty-hunting?
cleanhippie
Jan 2015
#28
Cheating to make you better is like taking steroids (which also makes you better)
Reter
Jan 2015
#97
Another FACT is that Jackson denies telling officials about the ball seeming to be
Malraiders
Jan 2015
#34
Interesting. I read an article that stated fter the interception, he notified his coahing staff
cleanhippie
Jan 2015
#38
The fact that the NFL hasn't even talked to him in their investigation says...
cleanhippie
Jan 2015
#41
I think there's a high probability that I won't be watching the game regardless...
brooklynite
Jan 2015
#89
"Anyone telling you that any of these things is likely, quite frankly, are either trolling,
KamaAina
Jan 2015
#102