Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 08:31 PM Jan 2015

Did John Boehner VIOLATE THE LAW By Inviting Netanyahu to Address Congress? [View all]






House GOP leader John Boehner (OH) made headlines in multiple countries with the announcement that he had asked Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address a joint session of Congress just weeks before the Israeli election. President Obama and Secretary Kerry have already announced they will not meet with him, as it is a breach of diplomatic protocol for an Israeli leader to visit Congress without first talking to the president. But Boehner may have run afoul of more than protocol – he may have also violated the law itself. The Logan Act, passed in 1799 and amended in 1904, states that no citizen of the United States can act on behalf of the United States government without its explicit approval. Boehner, as a Member of Congress, is not authorized to conduct foreign policy dealings that are explicitly the purview of the executive branch.



Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.



http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/953


While there have been no prosecutions under this law, the right was insistent that Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) violated in when she went to visit with Syrian President Bashar Assad in 2007.Although Boehner did not make that charge against Pelosi, he did say the only reason she carried out the visit was to “embarrass the president.If the right thought Pelosi visiting the Syrian president in Syria was a possible violation of the law, how can it justify Boehner explicitly coordinating with a foreign leader to address Congress to change U.S. policy?





cont'

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/did-john-boehner-violate-law-inviting-netanyahu-address-congress
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Keep your head down, you will be attacked here for saying that NoJusticeNoPeace Jan 2015 #1
Nope. The word "treason" is nowhere to be found in the article. arcane1 Jan 2015 #14
Anything to put him in prison. We can dream,No? easychoice Jan 2015 #2
Boehner in prison...would that be "Orange Is The New Orange"? n/t. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #31
Maybe the house of Orange Supermax? easychoice Jan 2015 #32
No you CANT if it means defending Obama or attacking the human garbage teaparty con NoJusticeNoPeace Jan 2015 #39
I think Boehner should be prosecuted for this. He violated the law, period. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Jan 2015 #3
He SHOULD be prosecuted for this. elleng Jan 2015 #4
Fugging enemy of the state malaise Jan 2015 #5
But this is about disrespecting Black man in White house, therefore NO, we wont do NoJusticeNoPeace Jan 2015 #40
Yes that is how the birther madness was handled malaise Jan 2015 #41
The patience the AfAm community shows, fucking amazes me...WOW NoJusticeNoPeace Jan 2015 #42
It's beyond amazing malaise Jan 2015 #44
Interesting, especially this part which does seem to apply to this invitation: sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #6
And they know it's a breach... Segami Jan 2015 #8
Yes, that they knew and did it anyway. It is spiteful and I hope the backlash teaches both of them sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #12
The hang up is the phrase "without authority if the United States" Telcontar Jan 2015 #7
Vis a vis foreign policy elleng Jan 2015 #18
so was the enactment of sanctions against South Africa onenote Jan 2015 #33
You are comparing an actual act of Congress to the actions of a single member of Congress. Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #34
See post 37 onenote Jan 2015 #38
The Constitution says.... Adrahil Jan 2015 #21
Boycott the sitting. lsewpershad Jan 2015 #9
Listening to a speech SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #10
Then let Dems invite Khomeini and let the President and Kerry attend this 'joint session' of sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #13
You know, the Iranian official who would hold that role in their goverment is President Hassan Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #35
there's more going on here than just a speech. it's never just a speech. unblock Jan 2015 #15
The paranoia around this place is simply amazing sometimes n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #16
paranoia? not in the least. this is the way politics is done. unblock Jan 2015 #20
I'm sure they will discuss issues of common interest. Chemisse Jan 2015 #25
It's not just a speech, even people in favor of new sanctions on Iran understand this is wrong. herding cats Jan 2015 #22
Turn the FuckingYahoo's plane back. DeSwiss Jan 2015 #11
Probably wanting our congress to give him more of our tax dollars B Calm Jan 2015 #17
So, what is to be gained?.... Segami Jan 2015 #19
So when the Democrats pushed through sanctions on South Africa over Reagan's veto onenote Jan 2015 #28
The US Congress has the Constitutional power to override a Presidential veto if they have enough Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #36
So you agree that Congress has a significant role to play with regard to foreign relations onenote Jan 2015 #37
The Speaker is not an alternate CinC Telcontar Jan 2015 #29
This is a perfect opportunity for the teabaggers in the house to remove him alfredo Jan 2015 #23
He's also facing a national election two weks later which is also 2naSalit Jan 2015 #24
Exactly! Chemisse Jan 2015 #26
No. onenote Jan 2015 #27
Well, i think we see how the next 18 months are going to go. Calista241 Jan 2015 #30
The Speaker of the House is the only one that extends invitations to speak before a joint session. tammywammy Jan 2015 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did John Boehner VIOLATE ...