Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tclambert

(11,193 posts)
20. Is it? My impression is a lot of people are hardwired wrong when it comes to statistics
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 11:30 PM
Jan 2015

and especially probability. I mean, casinos make money. That can only happen when a whole lot of people don't understand probability. It seems like our natural instincts fail us when it comes to probability and statistics. Ronald Reagan took advantage of that with his folksy anecdotes supposedly representing how things really worked when those stories were often statistical outliers (when they weren't outright fabrications (welfare queen in Chicago driving a Cadillac)).

Maybe people could be trained out of those inherent instincts, though. Some people really resist that, though. I remember a few students insisting certain examples of probability "didn't FEEL right" and therefore couldn't really BE right. And the professor struggled to convince them. It's weird how the human mind works, and it's weird the ways it works incorrectly, too.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

...the bigger story got buried 2naSalit Jan 2015 #1
K&R 2naSalit Jan 2015 #2
Lies, lies and more lies, Fox told me so. You can trust Fox! I am not a scientist, I trust Fox to do my Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #3
There will be no stopping of Climate Change. Lust for money will make sure we go extinct first. Rex Jan 2015 #4
I agree. CrispyQ Jan 2015 #7
I have to agree with Rex Jan 2015 #16
"Like the Club, only no human gets to join." Oh Yeah..I LIKE that! BlueJazz Jan 2015 #27
Laissez faire capitalism's end game..... paleotn Jan 2015 #10
In the end, there can be only one. tclambert Jan 2015 #14
Or barrel of water, in all likelihood hatrack Jan 2015 #15
DURec. bvar22 Jan 2015 #5
K&R Hubert Flottz Jan 2015 #6
K&R for truth. nt Mnemosyne Jan 2015 #8
If a denier wants to do bad trend analysis by starting with 1998, tclambert Jan 2015 #9
Only scam artists and idiots cherry pick data points in trend analysis daleo Jan 2015 #11
A lot of people don't know that, though. Math innumeracy makes them easy targets tclambert Jan 2015 #13
Mark Twain beat you to it by fifty years or so mrdmk Jan 2015 #18
Technical note: I believe credit for the first iteration of this statement may belong to KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #24
Math innumeracy is a cultural failing daleo Jan 2015 #19
Is it? My impression is a lot of people are hardwired wrong when it comes to statistics tclambert Jan 2015 #20
Probability can be difficult, and counterintuitive daleo Jan 2015 #21
there will be much suffering and gnashing of teeth nt hopemountain Jan 2015 #12
And a lot of garment rending too (especially as it gets warmer :) - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #25
and only tears will rain nt hopemountain Jan 2015 #26
We NEED to do "global dimming" NOW! oneview Jan 2015 #17
Purposely manipulating the weather is a dangerous idea, too daleo Jan 2015 #22
You're assuming we'd use the extra time to save ourselves NickB79 Jan 2015 #23
As usual for you, GREAT post, hatrack. Thanks nt Bigmack Jan 2015 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There Was No Global Warmi...»Reply #20