General Discussion

pnwmom

(110,261 posts)

28. All those fancy calculations do NOT account for the fact that the Colts balls were subject

Sat Jan 24, 2015, 12:46 AM

Jan 2015

to the same weather conditions, and were shown by the League tests to have the required pressure levels. Also, one of the Colts balls was of normal pressure.

The laws of physics don't hop around, affecting some balls and not others.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

51 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Another 'DeflateGate' theory. Weather/temperature? [View all] trof Jan 2015 OP

All I can think of is louis-t Jan 2015 #1

NFL has ruled out the temperature as a factor. eom MohRokTah Jan 2015 #2

They don't believe in physics? trof Jan 2015 #3

They claim that temperature variations... Bad Thoughts Jan 2015 #4

Aha! Now we're parsing. trof Jan 2015 #6

I believe it would have required a 45 degree drop in temperature Bad Thoughts Jan 2015 #8

The temperature was 59 degrees MohRokTah Jan 2015 #5

Yes, but it was raining. Pouring down. trof Jan 2015 #9

It is physically impossible for the balls t deflate by 2 PSI... MohRokTah Jan 2015 #10

The temperature was 50 not 59 at game time. former9thward Jan 2015 #13

Exactly. Barometric pressure changes have an effect too! trof Jan 2015 #15

Using your methodology, I calculated that dumbcat Jan 2015 #18

I agree. former9thward Jan 2015 #19

Joule-Thompson Effect - look it up. jberryhill Jan 2015 #36

Do you actually own a compressor? dumbcat Jan 2015 #43

I guess we need to know what they fill the balls with jberryhill Jan 2015 #44

They fill them with helium so they'll stay in the air longer. randome Jan 2015 #45

Exactly. And that is the crux of the problem dumbcat Jan 2015 #47

There was one article... jberryhill Jan 2015 #48

Of course, one of these would work much quicker: icymist Jan 2015 #20

No question. former9thward Jan 2015 #22

All those fancy calculations do NOT account for the fact that the Colts balls were subject pnwmom Jan 2015 #28

The calculations aren't all that fancy jberryhill Jan 2015 #39

Failure of invalid equilibrium assumptions jberryhill Jan 2015 #38

it's not so much the ambient conditions that are relevant... mike_c Jan 2015 #24

They think the rules of physics apply equally to Colts and Patriots balls. pnwmom Jan 2015 #27

Except the footballs on the other side of the field were and remained properly inflated mythology Jan 2015 #31

Accuweather says based on the temp change the FB's would have deflated by .4 psi not 2 psi Quixote1818 Jan 2015 #7

But the evaporation factor! trof Jan 2015 #11

It was raining, so almost no evaporation was occuring in the moist air Quixote1818 Jan 2015 #50

so balls on one side of field deflate, and those on the other side do not? magic not science on point Jan 2015 #12

Both sides supply the balls they will play with on offence. former9thward Jan 2015 #14

'human intervention'. Ya think? trof Jan 2015 #16

That or God. former9thward Jan 2015 #17

I'm going with God. trof Jan 2015 #21

If there was a simple scientific situation based on storage or testing conditions, pnwmom Jan 2015 #30

Temp was 51 at kickoff. Cali_Democrat Jan 2015 #23

Seems a reasonable possibilty: Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #25

How would that explain the 12th Patriots ball or all 12 Colts balls? pnwmom Jan 2015 #26

It might depend on the internal temperature of the balls before inpection. The temperature drop from Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #32

I read that all 11 balls were at least 2 under, not just one of the balls. pnwmom Jan 2015 #33

There have been conflicting reports: Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #34

If the human intervention took place in the beginning, pnwmom Jan 2015 #35

That's interesting. Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #37

when its cold and I go outside olddots Jan 2015 #29

NO! No! No! KMOD Jan 2015 #40

Perhaps the tapering could have been by using heat Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #42

I think DeflateGate is overblown davidpdx Jan 2015 #41

"Look, you don't understand. There was shrinkage." WinkyDink Jan 2015 #46

I was in the pool! I was in the pool! pintobean Jan 2015 #49

;-) WinkyDink Jan 2015 #51