Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)RT is the Devil's news service! [View all]
Well he didn't exactly say that, but he might be inspired to add that accusation later. At any rate, what our new chief of the US Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), Andrew Lack, did charge was something almost as ludicrous when he began his new tenure by equating RT News with the two worst terrorist groups currently active in the World. I guess there is only one acceptable "Point of view," the American one, and any news source which doesn't adhere to our government's line on all events of the day is just plain equivalent to people who kidnap children en-masse, murder helpless prisoners and film beheadings for their propaganda value? Right?
Andrew Lack.
RT equated to ISIS for daring to advocate a point of view
Following comments from the US overseas broadcasting chief listing RT as a challenge alongside the Islamic State and Boko Haram, critics said the outlet was singled out for daring to advocate a point of view, as well as for competing for viewership. On Wednesday, the new chief of the US Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), Andrew Lack, told the New York Times that RT posed a significant challenge putting the broadcaster in a list alongside the Islamic State and Boko Haram terror groups.
The comments have since been denounced on social networks and across the media spectrum. Speaking to RT, legal analyst and media commentator Lionel said the channel was being outrageously singled out and equated to the Islamic State for daring to advocate a point of view. In the history of incoherent statements, this might be the granddaddy of them all. In reading this, he alleges that Russia Today pushes a point of view, he told RTs Ameera David.
Georgetown University journalism professor Chris Chambers added that Lacks words were supremely silly and careless, especially considering his media background. Lack previously worked for NBC, Bloomberg, and Sony Music. This is a guy who has some media savvy, supposedly, even though hes moved around a lot maybe this is one reason hes moved around, Chambers told RT. But this was a very careless and silly thing to say considering the prevalence of corporate media here in the United States, and the purpose of BBGs constitutes like Voice of America, who are supposed to put out all kinds of views.
While Lacks comments were roundly criticized, Steven Ellis of the International Press Institute said he was right in one way. Mr. Lack could have phrased his comments more carefully: RT does indeed pose a challenge to US international broadcasting in terms of competing for viewership, he said. Asked about the issue on Friday, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki distanced the US government from Lacks comments, saying it doesnt agree with the statement.
(snip)
Read more, and see videos of RT's coverage of the story, at: http://rt.com/usa/225819-rt-isis-point-view-competition/
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lol, they said that about Al Jazeera also. Because we couldn't have real reporters reporting
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#53
Yes, all those Liberals RT gives a voice to who are kept off the Corporate Media, MUST be
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#58
I want Facts, and I find that RTs reporting is backed up on reputable sources around the world on
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#63
Since I am more than happy to repeat every word I have ever written here, why didn't you save
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#82
So you are proposing that Thom Hartmann supports Putin, you just can't prove it...
AgingAmerican
Jan 2015
#83
How about Chris Hedges, Democracy Now? How about Kucinich, or Members of the British Parliament?
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#86
Clearly you've never watched it. But thanks for the opinion. Opinions are always better when backed
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#87
I see you didn't read my comment at all. You have done what has become a recognizable
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#90
What have you got against personal freedom to pick and choose and evaluate information
polly7
Jan 2015
#21
You bad-mouth me and my opinions ("turd in the punch bowl" comes to mind) . . .
another_liberal
Jan 2015
#43
What would you call someone who joins a community then refuses to listen to said community?
randome
Jan 2015
#45
It is what it is - a mouthpiece for the Russian government. It is useful for presenting a different
pampango
Jan 2015
#31
If you believe that RT criticizes Russian policy and actions as frequently as the Times does to US'
pampango
Jan 2015
#36
No doubt, there are half-wits and idiots who believe that stories which invalidate a particular RT..
LanternWaste
Jan 2015
#62
