Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: LA TIMES: "Sen. Joni Ernst learned to 'live within her means' -- on the taxpayer's dime" [View all]Ms. Toad
(38,637 posts)133. I've read it (and the other similar articles) multiple times.
The anchor of the article - the only reason there is an article - is the "discovery" that her family was supposedly living off of taxpayer money, in contradiction to her claim that her family was living within their means.
But the data in the article doesn't contradict her story because it didn't come to her immediate family (for the most part), and didn't cover the time she was talking about. Pretending it does makes us look stupid.
If you are primarily making a broader point, you don't focus the headline and the bulk of the article on irrelevant data.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
154 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
LA TIMES: "Sen. Joni Ernst learned to 'live within her means' -- on the taxpayer's dime" [View all]
kpete
Jan 2015
OP
My question: Why do Democrats and Republicans both pass laws that indulge them?
merrily
Jan 2015
#24
Somehow, the system doesn't seem quite as broken for job creators or Republicans as for
merrily
Jan 2015
#52
I can only hope that it can be changed. I doubt I will be around however to see it.
olegramps
Jan 2015
#114
It's also a prime example of how legislators of both parties will sell us out.
merrily
Jan 2015
#145
We were sold out long before Citizens' United. CU did make it worse but it was, by far, not the
merrily
Jan 2015
#152
Has she received socialized medicine at the VA or in a health insurance program for vets
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#141
Not sure. I'm sure that she (possibly husdand) love their 50% pension, GI Bill, Housing, etc...
TheBlackAdder
Jan 2015
#149
She and her husband will probably receive a military pension (which they earned)
Frustratedlady
Jan 2015
#9
The question is, why didn't her Democratic opponent bring this up? It's not a secret
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#15
She campaigned on castrating hogs as a girl. That happened FAR earlier. And those contracts,
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#23
It goes to credibility as an anti-Big-gubmint Republican. It was Braley's due diligence to make it
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#33
+100. and you can pretty well bet braley's team DID know about it. which makes you wonder
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#77
The picture being painted for me is one that shows that the Democratic Party nor Braley
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#79
good question. i haven't see any evidence they did, though i haven't looked too hard. mainly
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#107
Well, maybe you should reread my posts on this thread. It'll bring things in context for you.
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#80
I don't care. I broke NO ToS rules. That said, his lackluster desire for Harkin's seat will hurt ALL
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#86
That what it looks like, yes. This should've been an easy win for him had he pointed out the
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#93
+100. "We just need to move on and forget the past" is the battle-cry of Third Way apologists
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#84
Don't tell me; I agree. Tell the folks who seem to think it's not fair to talk about it or
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#92
I judge politicians by their actions. Not ratings from think tanks that can be skewed to get
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#96
she benefited from it. when close relatives who live near one get big money, one benefits from it.
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#81
I don't think anyone claimed it proved her family was living off the taxpayer. I think the claim
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#135
her first job out of college was a government job, and coinicentally thats when her fathers
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#47
It proves that whatever happened in her childhood, it didn't stop her from working in
ND-Dem
Jan 2015
#61
The bigger issue that she neglects to advocate for cutting government subsidies to farmers
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2015
#27
The point is that she publicly is against "big government" and people relying on government...
George II
Jan 2015
#48
Her family didn't get any farm subsidies? She's not against "big government" supporting people?
George II
Jan 2015
#72
I checked a few sources - they did use bread bags with their shoes in that area...
George II
Jan 2015
#124
Epitomizes typical twisted right wing thinking. They crow that they should not pay taxes because
GoneFishin
Jan 2015
#34
HER FAMILY MEMBERS COLLECTED $463,000 IN FEDERAL FARM SUBSIDIES FROM 1995 THROUGH 2009.
malaise
Jan 2015
#35
Damn, the price of bread bags must really be high, maybe i need to collect my bread bags
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#57
I keep thinking of this song from "finian's rainbow"-- "when the idle poor become the idle rich"
niyad
Jan 2015
#73
They pulled their bootstraps, but they don't tell you how they got the boots
BeyondGeography
Jan 2015
#76
Image of family/church/community banding together to lift up poor, w/out govt help = Pure Fantasy
Beartracks
Jan 2015
#87
One thing that is not pure fantasy is the Orphan & Widows Fund through Fraternal Organizations
Hestia
Jan 2015
#118
Joni Bloney Phoney is just another sociopathic republiCon.. bleating lies and spewing bread sacks
Cha
Jan 2015
#123
On the other hand, farm subsidies are a wonderful program that keep farmers on their farms
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#139