Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: YES!!! -- House & Senate Democrats Introduce 12 Bills Targeted at Campaign Finance Reform [View all]davidn3600
(6,342 posts)43. Congress cannot overturn Citizens United
That can only be done with Constitutional amendment, or the Supreme Court has to reverse themselves (which rarely happens).
So any of these proposed laws have a very limited effect, even if they were to pass.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
YES!!! -- House & Senate Democrats Introduce 12 Bills Targeted at Campaign Finance Reform [View all]
KoKo
Jan 2015
OP
How is presenting proposals going nowhere supposed to offset or make for something actually passed?
TheKentuckian
Jan 2015
#31
The fact they will not pass the GOP Congress has nothing to with what good ideas they are.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#4
They had the ideas all along, this is procedurally a different thing to bring a vote to the Senate floor on a
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#8
Thank you. If folks only knew what a piece of judicial crap CU was , from every angle, not just
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#14
Thanks. Good thing the context was in the same line, can not afford another misunderstanding.
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#19
Where were these ideas in 2009 and 2010? Why didn't they secure voting rights then?
Scuba
Jan 2015
#46
Wouldn't that view require dems to have not changed or learned anything since 2009?
HereSince1628
Jan 2015
#47