Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

on point

(2,506 posts)

1. I have a better plan. Tax retained earnings at 10% per year worldwide.

Reply to Panich52 (Original post)

Mon Jan 26, 2015, 12:02 PM

Jan 2015

Of course, it would be cheaper for them to just bring it home and pay a one time tax, or pay it out to stockholders in dividends.

We should stocky be working with other OECD countries for a standard worldwide rate for corps and wealthy. That's the real TPP we need.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is rewarding tax avoidance the way to fund infrastructure needs? [View all] Panich52 Jan 2015 OP

I have a better plan. Tax retained earnings at 10% per year worldwide. on point Jan 2015 #1

Let me dust off my "US Seizes the Cayman Islands Proposal..." FSogol Jan 2015 #2

My wife is a noted tax lawyer and thinks this is a horrible idea... brooklynite Jan 2015 #3

I Think Your Wife Is On To Something ProfessorGAC Jan 2015 #4