Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(141,926 posts)
4. It IS standard operating procedure under these circumstances:
Mon Jan 26, 2015, 05:52 PM
Jan 2015

These are the standards courts are required to use, in making such decisions.

'The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond said McDonnell's appeal raises a substantial question of law or fact that "if decided in favor of the accused" is "important enough" to warrant reversal or a new trial.

The court also said McDonnell isn't a flight risk or a danger to others and that the appeal isn't just a delay tactic. It ordered that briefs in the case be filed by March 2 and set a May 12 hearing.'



Does depend, of course, on use/availability of counsel who can take the appeal.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»COURT: EX-VIRGINIA GOV. M...»Reply #4