Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Two four star Marine generals demands that President Obama veto the National Defense Authorization [View all]truedelphi
(32,324 posts)52. Thanks, One Voice
I also find it amazing that our legislative process is set up so that in order to get the funding to continue to fight the wars (And supposedly help those troops we need to support) we can also find provisions that strip away our liberties, or kill babies, if that's what the Powers that Be want to have happen.
Obama even campaigned regarding the notion that under his Administration, there wouldn't be
1) legislative acts over 500 pages in length
2) unrelated items coming up under other legislative matters
This was an important promise, yet once he became President, he became like "What? Why me have to worry about the legislative process - that ball is in Congress's court!"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Two four star Marine generals demands that President Obama veto the National Defense Authorization [View all]
lovuian
Dec 2011
OP
It's a big deal. Generals aren't known for casually endorsing freedom over "security."
DirkGently
Dec 2011
#16
Good. And here's the link: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/13/opinion/guantanamo-forever.html
DirkGently
Dec 2011
#5
The point is that the opinion of a "retired general" is no more legitimate than any other
jberryhill
Dec 2011
#47
Krulak is not just a former general. He was the 31st Commandant of the Marine Corps. A rare honor.
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2011
#19
David M Shoup was also top notch. He was right, and he had insight as to what was planned.
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2011
#46
they should read DU. it would make them feel super double good about this bill.
piratefish08
Dec 2011
#30
The very fact that the bill is so vague and interpreted so differently DEMANDS that...
stillwaiting
Dec 2011
#33