Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
2. Intellectual Property and Drug Prices:
Tue Jan 27, 2015, 11:53 PM
Jan 2015


(Americans deserve a bit more than lofty words in the "Summary of Objectives" deemed suitable for public consumption.)




Intellectual Property and Drug Prices

One example of the way the intellectual property provisions favor giant, multinational corporations over smaller, innovative corporations and regular people around the world is in pharmaceutical prices.

A company with a drug patent is granted a monopoly to sell the drug at any price they choose with no competition. Currently a drug might be patented for a limited number of years in different countries. When the patent runs out other companies are able to manufacture the drug and the competition means the drug will sell at a lower cost.

Leaked documents appear to show that TPP will extend patent terms for drugs. Countries signing the agreement will scrap their own IP rules and instead follow those in TPP. So giant drug companies will have the same patent in all countries, for a longer period, and the patent will prevent competition that lowers drug prices.

Currently smaller, innovative companies can produce “generic” drugs after patents run out. Because of competition these drugs can be very inexpensive. Walmart, for example, sells a month’s supply of many generic drugs for $4, while drugs still under patent protection can cost hundreds or even thousands. This is of particular concern to poor countries that will be under TPP rules.

Please read Expose The TPP‘s section The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Public Health, which begins:

The TPP would provide large pharmaceutical firms with new rights and powers to increase medicine prices and limit consumers’ access to cheaper generic drugs. This would include extensions of monopoly drug patents that would allow drug companies to raise prices for more medicines and even allow monopoly rights over surgical procedures. For people in the developing countries involved in TPP, these rules could be deadly – denying consumers access to HIV-AIDS, tuberculosis and cancer drugs.....


http://www.commondreams.org/views/2014/02/25/how-tpp-would-harm-you-drug-store-and-internet

















Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The US Government's Negotiating objectives, related to drugs ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #1
Intellectual Property and Drug Prices: Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #2
How is relying on the lofty words of the US Objectives ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #3
Krugman has a pretty good answer for you: Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #4
Again, what is he basing that opinion on ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #12
When our negotiating positions stink, & when "really bad ideas" are "being floated", & when Congress Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #37
history ND-Dem Jan 2015 #24
History is the opposite of progress. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #30
so far as governments lying goes, there has been no "progress" in millenia. ND-Dem Jan 2015 #38
Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #40
You are correct. THe rhetoric you repeat above is nothing like what is contained in the agreement. rhett o rick Jan 2015 #5
There is no agreement yet, so it's silly to talk about "what's in it" Recursion Jan 2015 #6
Secrecy + Corporate Input + Fast Track + "Don't Talk about what's in it tell it's done" = OLIGARCHY Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #7
Bingo Populist_Prole Jan 2015 #8
if they obey tpp, the world will have drug prices as high as those in the US which are way ND-Dem Jan 2015 #25
Response to your first comment ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #13
Response to your first comment ... rhett o rick Jan 2015 #29
That's NOT a dodge ... It is a direct answer to your question ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #33
The discrepancy you cite is EXACTLY the point. Jim Lane Jan 2015 #10
+1 Good post BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #11
We have people who I trust that have seen the TPP and are firmly against it. stillwaiting Jan 2015 #14
I have not seen a single person expressing support for ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #16
Oh my... nt stillwaiting Jan 2015 #17
Well, at least not on DU ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #18
I consider support for Fast Track, in effect, support for the TPP. stillwaiting Jan 2015 #19
How? ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #20
Fast Track means that, no matter what unsavory stuff is contained in the TPP - nothing djean111 Jan 2015 #26
No ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #31
The GOP is slavering for this agreement, because it enables corporations to djean111 Jan 2015 #32
The gop is slathering over this agreement ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #34
His "stated" objectives are trade based. He does not address the Investor State giveaway. djean111 Jan 2015 #35
Yes.He.Does ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #36
The analysis by Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #15
I disagree with your criticisms of Medecins Sans Frontieres. Jim Lane Jan 2015 #21
because they've done so well so far at 'negotiating' prices with big pharma ND-Dem Jan 2015 #22
The US government hasn't been involved in ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #28
It would allow the shysters to push prices on alreadt skyrocketing generics through the roof. Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #9
+100 ND-Dem Jan 2015 #23
This is so simple for those who DO support Fast Track - thus supporting the TPP - just don't djean111 Jan 2015 #27
In December, MSF together with the AFL-CIO, AARP and the Generic Pharmaceutical Association sent Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TPP Trade Deal Will Be De...»Reply #2