Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Young woman shot and killed by Denver police in "stolen car" incident. [View all]Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts)141. Most people don't steal.
I never have stolen. No one in my family steals. I wouldn't be friends with a thief because nice people don't commit crimes.
You act like everyone commits crimes in some shape or form.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Young woman shot and killed by Denver police in "stolen car" incident. [View all]
librechik
Jan 2015
OP
Stealing a car was a right of passage for many of us as teens back in the day
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#1
First of all, at this point all we have is what the cops told us or the media, and cops lie
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#5
He shot her in revenge rather than because he was in danger? Thanks for clarifying. nt
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#73
shooting someone after they run you over is "surviving in the face of violence", even if it was acci
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#122
Killing people who ram you is a crime. Don't want to be dead - don't do Oh wait...
Taitertots
Jan 2015
#140
Both, my brother borrowed from our parents and paid hell for it and he stole
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#23
Are you implying that stealing a candy bar is the same as running over a police officer?
Travis_0004
Jan 2015
#131
Oh we can keep it RIGHT HERE for everybody to see, I know OUTSPOKEN liberals are
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#22
I was extremely happy when I wrote that...i am not the one pretending to be a saint
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#93
ahh, the OLE "struck a nerve" ploy when you have nothing else to say, so as to make
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#147
I would never disclose that, there are many people on the internet, probably right here at DU
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#92
"Stealing a car was a right of passage for many of us as teens back in the day"
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#79
So it's not about justice so much as your ability to commit felonies without interference.
name not needed
Jan 2015
#118
"Purposely" is the issue here. Did the 17 yr old do this on purpose or panicked accidentally?
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#75
that broken leg for not appear to have been broken. Today's articles say injured.
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#104
Yep, some folk INSTANTLY believe anything and everything a cop says, and some dont
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#7
do you really buy the notion that the girl deliberately tried to hurt the officer?
librechik
Jan 2015
#9
The only practical way to avoid getting run over is kill the driver? How about getting out of the
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#76
Hostile encounters like this happen every day in U.S. high school parking lots...
hunter
Jan 2015
#137
High school students are running over other people with stolen cars on a daily basis?
Ace Rothstein
Jan 2015
#144
I'm an anarchist. In my not-so-humble opinion the police should be disbanded.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#83
I do not see anything about a broken leg in today's reports of this. Just "injured"
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#95
The severity of the injury is immaterial. The driver drove the car at someone.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#97
and today's reports do not indicate a fractured leg. 1st reports often are inaccurate
uppityperson
Jan 2015
#100
Again, the severity of the injury is immaterial. The driver drove at another person. That qualifies
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#107
NO, neither have I claimed what happened, only unwilling to instantly believe every word
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#30
You dont even realize what you are saying, if you did maybe you would think twice
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#34
Stop it, you are embarrassing yourself... you are INSISTING that unless I was THERE i MUST accept
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#36
LOL look who it is!!! I have to comment now before I am locked out for being too liberal
NoJusticeNoPeace
Jan 2015
#38
Let's see how it plays out. The truth is usually in the middle of the extremes.
Dreamer Tatum
Jan 2015
#48
Were you there AS it happened, WHILE it was happening, or AFTER it happened?
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2015
#72
look--we don't "know" the car was stolen by those kids--that would have to be determined in court
librechik
Jan 2015
#70
Seeing "the immediatie aftermath" and seeing what actually happened are two different things.
WillowTree
Jan 2015
#64
He mentions "Every one of us who lives in the neighborhood and saw what occurred"
JonLP24
Jan 2015
#133
I've seen a lot of stories about cops killing drivers who hit or rolled toward them.
Comrade Grumpy
Jan 2015
#51
wow. Thank you so much for this thoughtful (and fortuitous) post, Sarcastinator
librechik
Jan 2015
#69
The people who say we are anti-police when we decry cops murdering unarmed civilians
Chemisse
Jan 2015
#81
you say 14, the article says 17, and an earshot witness in "the immediate aftermath" says 16
NM_Birder
Jan 2015
#85
"the teen driving the car drove into one of the police officers, fracturing his leg."
Agnosticsherbet
Jan 2015
#132