Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
10. The discrepancy you cite is EXACTLY the point.
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 03:35 AM
Jan 2015

The administration, promoting the TPP, has a glowing statement on its website, telling us all what lovely things it's doing and how noble its intentions are.

But, as you say, this public relations effort is "not exactly (or even close to) what the OP indictates."

The OP discusses the analysis by Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF). Note this passage about the discrepancy you identify:

“The intellectual property provisions of the TPP completely undermine the Administration’s stated public health goals, including its own goal to achieve an AIDS-free generation,” said Malpani. “While President Obama speaks of expanding health care and tackling issues of income inequality at home, he is actively promoting a trade agreement that will exacerbate economic disparities and endanger people’s health care worldwide.”

MSF has relied on leaks of the TPP text for information because the negotiations have been held in secret. While MSF and other civil society groups have been excluded from official negotiations on the TPP, industry groups representing various multinational corporations have had the opportunity to read the text and suggest revisions.


The implication of your post is that press releases about noble goals are always true, but that leaks of actual negotiated text are unreliable. Many of us disagree.

If all this is just tin-foil-hattery combined with Obama Derangement Syndrome, maybe the administration could give MSF "the opportunity to read the text and suggest revisions." Then we could all have more confidence in the process. And, since the text would be thoughtfully designed to promote innovation, ensure access to medications, etc., as per the PR, the result would be that MSF would give its enthusiastic endorsement. Win-win, isn't it?

...Unless, of course, the PR is a wee bit less than completely accurate (or, to put it another way, unless the PR is completely bogus).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The US Government's Negotiating objectives, related to drugs ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #1
Intellectual Property and Drug Prices: Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #2
How is relying on the lofty words of the US Objectives ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #3
Krugman has a pretty good answer for you: Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #4
Again, what is he basing that opinion on ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #12
When our negotiating positions stink, & when "really bad ideas" are "being floated", & when Congress Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #37
history ND-Dem Jan 2015 #24
History is the opposite of progress. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #30
so far as governments lying goes, there has been no "progress" in millenia. ND-Dem Jan 2015 #38
Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #40
You are correct. THe rhetoric you repeat above is nothing like what is contained in the agreement. rhett o rick Jan 2015 #5
There is no agreement yet, so it's silly to talk about "what's in it" Recursion Jan 2015 #6
Secrecy + Corporate Input + Fast Track + "Don't Talk about what's in it tell it's done" = OLIGARCHY Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #7
Bingo Populist_Prole Jan 2015 #8
if they obey tpp, the world will have drug prices as high as those in the US which are way ND-Dem Jan 2015 #25
Response to your first comment ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #13
Response to your first comment ... rhett o rick Jan 2015 #29
That's NOT a dodge ... It is a direct answer to your question ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #33
The discrepancy you cite is EXACTLY the point. Jim Lane Jan 2015 #10
+1 Good post BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #11
We have people who I trust that have seen the TPP and are firmly against it. stillwaiting Jan 2015 #14
I have not seen a single person expressing support for ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #16
Oh my... nt stillwaiting Jan 2015 #17
Well, at least not on DU ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #18
I consider support for Fast Track, in effect, support for the TPP. stillwaiting Jan 2015 #19
How? ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #20
Fast Track means that, no matter what unsavory stuff is contained in the TPP - nothing djean111 Jan 2015 #26
No ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #31
The GOP is slavering for this agreement, because it enables corporations to djean111 Jan 2015 #32
The gop is slathering over this agreement ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #34
His "stated" objectives are trade based. He does not address the Investor State giveaway. djean111 Jan 2015 #35
Yes.He.Does ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #36
The analysis by Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #15
I disagree with your criticisms of Medecins Sans Frontieres. Jim Lane Jan 2015 #21
because they've done so well so far at 'negotiating' prices with big pharma ND-Dem Jan 2015 #22
The US government hasn't been involved in ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #28
It would allow the shysters to push prices on alreadt skyrocketing generics through the roof. Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #9
+100 ND-Dem Jan 2015 #23
This is so simple for those who DO support Fast Track - thus supporting the TPP - just don't djean111 Jan 2015 #27
In December, MSF together with the AFL-CIO, AARP and the Generic Pharmaceutical Association sent Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TPP Trade Deal Will Be De...»Reply #10