Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
8. It is the History Channel and it is not accurate history.
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 09:20 AM
Jan 2015

Which is why I don't watch the Fictionalized History Channel anymore.

If I want fiction, I will read a book or watch a movie that is clearly labeled as fiction.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Take what you see in "Sons of Liberty" with a grain of salt. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2015 #1
the details may suffer... grasswire Jan 2015 #2
It is the History Channel and it is not accurate history. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2015 #8
And they warn viewers of that with a disclaimer: Ykcutnek Jan 2015 #9
Sadly, pepople ignore disclaimers. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2015 #10
I mainly read historical fiction. Historical fiction is highly educational when done well. KittyWampus Jan 2015 #12
Hell, we've taught historical fiction in schools for years. Ykcutnek Jan 2015 #16
They don't teach that old myth anymore, at least in California. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2015 #20
I never learned it in school, but since I was born on February 22, Cleita Jan 2015 #30
I went to school beginning in the late 50's in Oklahoma. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2015 #32
History Channel said it was factionalized. Cleita Jan 2015 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jan 2015 #3
Well, actually that term was coined for the French Revolution and first used in English about the Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #7
Bluenorthwest- your post right here wins the internet for today. KittyWampus Jan 2015 #13
Johnson was also apropos Recursion Jan 2015 #26
Its pretty much all theaterical license taken by those that give you Historic NY Jan 2015 #4
Instead of the historically inaccurate tv show, read Les Standiford's, FSogol Jan 2015 #5
I watched it and enjoyed it. HappyMe Jan 2015 #6
It is so historically incorrect it is too painful to watch. I can watch Vikings cause KittyWampus Jan 2015 #11
"We have been colonized again." Absolutely. Great post. And yes, we Zorra Jan 2015 #14
We need a revolution but it is just not us. The world needs a revolution to put the corporations jwirr Jan 2015 #22
True. nt Zorra Jan 2015 #33
I hope schools don't use The Fiction Channel for lessons or discussion as if it 's accurate lunasun Jan 2015 #15
I think it could be useful to start a discussion and to point kids in Cleita Jan 2015 #19
That is how I learned to love history. Read a fictionalized book and started looking for facts. You jwirr Jan 2015 #23
Zombies A Living History, wasn't that bad kydo Jan 2015 #17
The American Revolution was the American 1% revolting against the British 1% Recursion Jan 2015 #21
Wasn't John Hancock the richest guy who signed the Declaration of Independence? Cleita Jan 2015 #24
Tough call between him and Washington Recursion Jan 2015 #25
Got a link for that stat? nt Zorra Jan 2015 #31
HBO's John Adams was excellent historical fiction, IMO zazen Jan 2015 #27
Titus and Pullo were mentioned by Julius Caesar in one of his Cleita Jan 2015 #28
thx--yep, knew that, but the rest of their characters were fictionalized zazen Jan 2015 #29
Why not just watch that old Disney movie, "Johnny Tremain"? Paladin Jan 2015 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anybody watching "So...»Reply #8