Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Invisible Man: Jeffrey Sterling, CIA Whistleblower [View all]bigtree
(93,770 posts)25. that's nonsense.
Risen has already stated that he had numerous sources for his book.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Operation Merlin was a successful Clinton era op. We gave fake plans to Iran,
msanthrope
Jan 2015
#6
Tell us why you think President Clinton should go to jail for Operation Merlin. nt
msanthrope
Jan 2015
#16
there's nothing to guarantee Risen testifying Sterling wasn't the source would have exonerated him
bigtree
Jan 2015
#35
How is it a strawman? The allegation was that Sterling leaked to Risen. Sterling denied it.
randome
Jan 2015
#44
tha answer is that the defense felt they could not compel that answer from Risen
bigtree
Jan 2015
#49
So Sterling wanted to go to jail because he didn't want to inconvenience Risen?
randome
Jan 2015
#51
his initial report was to Senate investigators and it's questionable whether the 'leak' was from him
bigtree
Jan 2015
#13
If it had....why didn't Sterling call Risen to the stand to confirm that Sterling
msanthrope
Jan 2015
#14
Wrong....Risen refused to reveal his source to the prosecution. Had the defense
msanthrope
Jan 2015
#21
No...it's legal fact. The reason Risen wasn't called to the stand, although Sterling could have
msanthrope
Jan 2015
#30
Risen wouldn't testify for the prosecution. He'd have been immediately jailed at the trial
msanthrope
Jan 2015
#22
Yes...it's been the law of the land for 40 years now. You don't have a right to avoid
msanthrope
Jan 2015
#40
Oh bullshit. Sterling blowing the whistle on ridiculous botched CIA ops
riderinthestorm
Jan 2015
#54
hoping that if enough garbage is thrown in the air, readers will turn away from the stink
bigtree
Jan 2015
#38
Yes...it must be disinformation if someone not only disagrees with you, they
msanthrope
Jan 2015
#42
strange to present yourself as an authority on Sterling's defense, while working to discredit him
bigtree
Jan 2015
#47
Thank you...what was posted completely supports my point. The defense could have
msanthrope
Jan 2015
#48
He still could have been called by defense, and had he refused on the stand, at trial,
msanthrope
Jan 2015
#53
so 'damning' that the government pleaded with the judge to bar Risen's testimony
bigtree
Jan 2015
#64
