Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

whistleblowers are invisible at DU too. grasswire Jan 2015 #1
There's a contingent here who vilify whistleblowers relentlessly riderinthestorm Jan 2015 #3
kick bigtree Jan 2015 #2
It's not Sterling who should be heading to prison, but his former bosses. Octafish Jan 2015 #4
Operation Merlin was a successful Clinton era op. We gave fake plans to Iran, msanthrope Jan 2015 #6
Of course not. Octafish Jan 2015 #8
Tell us why you think President Clinton should go to jail for Operation Merlin. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #16
But that's not what I wrote, is it? Octafish Jan 2015 #34
You said "his former bosses." nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #58
Who's the boss of the Secret Government, msanthrope? Octafish Jan 2015 #60
was it really a 'success'? bigtree Jan 2015 #11
Boom! Owned AND served! No one will ever know whether KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #12
Does Iran have nukes? Then it was a success. Were there other fuckups? msanthrope Jan 2015 #15
it has always been questionable whether Iran had a nuke program to begin with bigtree Jan 2015 #20
And? Still doesn't make Operation Merlin illegal. Further, Risen did not msanthrope Jan 2015 #23
Risen was protecting his sources, as any good reporter will do, have done bigtree Jan 2015 #24
So who was Sterling protecting, as msanthrope points out? randome Jan 2015 #28
Sterling was protecting himself. bigtree Jan 2015 #33
You are suggesting Risen let an innocent man be convicted. There is no msanthrope Jan 2015 #32
there's nothing to guarantee Risen testifying Sterling wasn't the source would have exonerated him bigtree Jan 2015 #35
How is it a strawman? The allegation was that Sterling leaked to Risen. Sterling denied it. randome Jan 2015 #44
tha answer is that the defense felt they could not compel that answer from Risen bigtree Jan 2015 #49
So Sterling wanted to go to jail because he didn't want to inconvenience Risen? randome Jan 2015 #51
of course, I didn't say anything of the kind bigtree Jan 2015 #57
Successful? Likely not. Luminous Animal Jan 2015 #26
"That may be what happened with Merlin." msanthrope Jan 2015 #37
It's not whistleblowing when you leak to the press a perfectly legal CIA msanthrope Jan 2015 #5
the 'leak' likely came from Congress first bigtree Jan 2015 #9
Sometimes lawsuits arise from being 'malcontent'. randome Jan 2015 #10
his initial report was to Senate investigators and it's questionable whether the 'leak' was from him bigtree Jan 2015 #13
If it had....why didn't Sterling call Risen to the stand to confirm that Sterling msanthrope Jan 2015 #14
such nonsense bigtree Jan 2015 #17
Wrong....Risen refused to reveal his source to the prosecution. Had the defense msanthrope Jan 2015 #21
that's nonsense. bigtree Jan 2015 #25
No...it's legal fact. The reason Risen wasn't called to the stand, although Sterling could have msanthrope Jan 2015 #30
funny that conclusion wasn't ANY part of the prosecution case bigtree Jan 2015 #36
You really think the jury was so dim-witted they didn't notice the utter msanthrope Jan 2015 #39
we're done, msanthrope bigtree Jan 2015 #43
I'm encouraging posters to read the actual case documents, like msanthrope Jan 2015 #45
Risen wouldn't testify. He's been all over the news with that riderinthestorm Jan 2015 #18
Risen wouldn't testify for the prosecution. He'd have been immediately jailed at the trial msanthrope Jan 2015 #22
I'll let Common Dreams answer for me riderinthestorm Jan 2015 #27
right, good link bigtree Jan 2015 #29
Yes...it's been the law of the land for 40 years now. You don't have a right to avoid msanthrope Jan 2015 #40
Oh bullshit. Sterling blowing the whistle on ridiculous botched CIA ops riderinthestorm Jan 2015 #54
So when Sterling revealed Human Asset #1 to sell his book..... msanthrope Jan 2015 #56
Indefatigable apologist for the administration. nt elias49 Jan 2015 #31
hoping that if enough garbage is thrown in the air, readers will turn away from the stink bigtree Jan 2015 #38
Yes...it must be disinformation if someone not only disagrees with you, they msanthrope Jan 2015 #42
strange to present yourself as an authority on Sterling's defense, while working to discredit him bigtree Jan 2015 #47
Thank you...what was posted completely supports my point. The defense could have msanthrope Jan 2015 #48
Risen stated in pre-trial, unequivocally, that he would NOT reveal his sources bigtree Jan 2015 #52
He still could have been called by defense, and had he refused on the stand, at trial, msanthrope Jan 2015 #53
there would still be a question of what the reporter was withholding bigtree Jan 2015 #59
Hey.....that "question" translates into "reasonable doubt." msanthrope Jan 2015 #62
so 'damning' that the government pleaded with the judge to bar Risen's testimony bigtree Jan 2015 #64
They wanted to bar the transcript, because Risen could be called. I would expect no less from any msanthrope Jan 2015 #65
that book you say 'Sterling' wrote, was trying to sell? bigtree Jan 2015 #61
Ha!!! No....the book he was negotiations with. CIA wouldn't clear it. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #63
I have nothing to apologize for. This has been the law for 40 years...you msanthrope Jan 2015 #41
You need to read for understanding elias49 Jan 2015 #50
Your old "Julian Assange" thread? The one that got hidden? msanthrope Jan 2015 #55
I thought we were signers of the Nuclear Nonproliferation pact. JEB Jan 2015 #7
This was exactly what we demanded Cheney and Libby's head for Recursion Jan 2015 #19
I love the post hoc defense of Judith Miller presented in this thread. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Invisible Man: Jeffre...»Reply #25