Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 5 Devastating Facts About Charter Schools You Won't Hear from the 'National School Choice Week' [View all]Orrex
(66,902 posts)21. The problems you cite won't be corrected by leeching money from public schools
Nor will they be improved by having charter schools cherrypick the better-performing students while excluding the more challenging students, as is a common practice.
Incidentally, creationists also love to push their agenda in schools by singing the praises of "competition" and "choice," so you should be conscious of the way your arguments resonate with the slogans of those groups, too.
I am afraid there are far too many families and children trapped by circumstance in schools and districts where mediocrity is accepted as the status quo, and any challenge to it must be quelled.
That's a slogan taken straight out of the privatization playbook. And I guarantee you with 100% certainty that charter schools don't welcome "challenges to the status quo" nearly as readily as you seem to believe.
No doubt they accept "challenges" of a certain type and within a certain framework, but they're profit-generating machines that don't, ultimately, tolerate challenges to the bottom line. Under-performing students will be booted back to the public schools, and the charters will re-declare the superduper achievements of the students who survive the cut.
The single biggest predictor of educational success is parental involvement in the schools, and that is where charter schools have the huge advantage over regular public schools: They often require that parents volunteer their time.
That's another lovely slogan, but it's simply a formula for restricting access to this much-touted resource. You claim to advocate for children "trapped by circumstances," but you're simply not seeing reality: A single mother with two jobs and a brilliant child won't be able to volunteer at the school, so her child will be excluded.
You're arguing, in effect, that it's ok to trap low-income children in very circumstances of mediocrity that you claim to decry.
Parents who wish to enroll their children in private schools with distinguished records of performance are free and welcome to do so, but neither they nor the charter schools have any business stealing money from public schools in order to subsidize that effort.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
5 Devastating Facts About Charter Schools You Won't Hear from the 'National School Choice Week' [View all]
xchrom
Jan 2015
OP
They've found a way to transplant the "Christian Academies" of the post-integration Deep South
hatrack
Jan 2015
#3
Charter Schools were never intended to provide a quality alternative to public education
Orrex
Jan 2015
#5
Charter schools have comparable results with much poorer and less-white students
Recursion
Jan 2015
#9
As long as they don't siphon any money from public schools, then more power to them
Orrex
Jan 2015
#15
Well, no; I'm pretty sure in every jurisdiction they are required to be not-for-profit
Recursion
Jan 2015
#26
Where does it go in neighborhood schools? Mostly salaries, maintenance, and transportation
Recursion
Jan 2015
#30
Public schools have to foot the bill for a lot of services leeched by charter schools
Orrex
Jan 2015
#33